Aeson
I've gone barmy
You can't eat that. It's for the wrestling match between reveal and DangerGirl!.Heckler said:Screw that. Having returned from the kitchen, I must report a disheartening lack of cookies.![]()
I have, however, acquired pudding.![]()
You can't eat that. It's for the wrestling match between reveal and DangerGirl!.Heckler said:Screw that. Having returned from the kitchen, I must report a disheartening lack of cookies.![]()
I have, however, acquired pudding.![]()
Were you the previous tenant?Heckler said:Just heard this on the news.
Local pregnant mother and her three kids recently rent a house and move in. They develop serious health problems (nosebleeds, coughing up what they describe as "coffee grounds") and end up contacting local officials. After some testing they determine the house had been used as a meth lab. EVERYTHING this family own is contaminated and must be destroyed. They should recover their health.
Police have more than a few questions for the previous tenant.
I am officially not happy.![]()
Heckler said:
Both examples I gave were correct examples, since they "for" and "with" are prepositions. Using either in the wrong place is incorrect.Aeson said:Which is the incorrect use? Using who in the wrong place or using whom in the wrong place?
I take it I was the subject in her sentence.
I will never be a writer. My English skills are poor.![]()
Not you.Heckler said:Whom cares.![]()