Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The impending mess that will be backwards compatibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 8983714" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>One of the things that was "new to 5e" was the notion of a universal "proficiency bonus." Like the d20 resolution mechanic and the (never since changed) standardized ability score bonuses that were codified with 3e, this is a mechanic that is both brand-new, yet somehow <em>feels</em> 100% like it's something that should have always been in <em>Dungeons & Dragons</em>. If you look at it critically, 5e is a "greatest hits" version of D&D, adhering to the following (Feature and edition where it was part of the initial release):</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">6 Ability Scores, Levels, Hit Points, Armor Class, Saving Throws, Slot-based Spellcasting (OD&D)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Classes: Cleric, Fighter (Fighting Man), and Wizard (Mage/Magic-User) (OD&D)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Races: Dwarf, Elf, Halfling (Hobbit), Human (OD&D)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Class: Rogue (Thief) (Holmes)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Dual-Axis alignment (1e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Classes: Druid, Monk, Paladin, Ranger (1e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Races: Gnome, Half-Elf, Half-Orc (1e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Class: Bard (2e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Subclasses (Kits) (2e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Universal "d20, roll high" resolution mechanic (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">3 (-4) -> 18 (+4) bonus table (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No restrictions race/class choices (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Feats (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Skills (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Standardized multiclassing (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Classes: Barbarian, Sorcerer (3e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">"Short Rest" and "Long Rest" recovery mechanics (4e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Class: Warlock (4e)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Races: Dragonborn, Tiefling, Drow (4e)</li> </ul><p></p><p>There have been minor adjustments to various subsystems along the way, such as Wildshape becoming more and more of a core feature of the Druid class, or a class's spellcasting being improved (most recently Bards, Paladins, Rangers, but earlier including Clerics and Druids) but the game is honestly starting to settle down.</p><p> </p><p>They tried radically rewriting the game with 4e, and it landed like a lead balloon with the majority of the audience. So 5th-Edition was more like a "4th-Edition - take 2!" that shared much more of its DNA with 3e and the editions before it - which is, I suspect, why they initially resisted actually labeling it "Fifth Edition." And, as I pointed out in my earlier post, the classification of "3rd-Edition" as such is at least moderately suspect.</p><p></p><p>I honestly don't think Hasbro wants to keep making "New Editions" (TM), so much as just augment the game with supplements they can sell, and just do a revised printing of the PHB/DMG/MM (when it's called for) that modifies things they've learned don't work the way they want them to, or introduces things they want to try out, and just includes a few "changes since the last printing" sidebars.</p><p></p><p>Going forward, the game is just <em>Dungeons & Dragons</em>. But if you insist on Edition labeling, I guess you can think of the 2024 books as Edition 5.2 or 5.3.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 8983714, member: 32164"] One of the things that was "new to 5e" was the notion of a universal "proficiency bonus." Like the d20 resolution mechanic and the (never since changed) standardized ability score bonuses that were codified with 3e, this is a mechanic that is both brand-new, yet somehow [I]feels[/I] 100% like it's something that should have always been in [I]Dungeons & Dragons[/I]. If you look at it critically, 5e is a "greatest hits" version of D&D, adhering to the following (Feature and edition where it was part of the initial release): [LIST] [*]6 Ability Scores, Levels, Hit Points, Armor Class, Saving Throws, Slot-based Spellcasting (OD&D) [*]Classes: Cleric, Fighter (Fighting Man), and Wizard (Mage/Magic-User) (OD&D) [*]Races: Dwarf, Elf, Halfling (Hobbit), Human (OD&D) [*]Class: Rogue (Thief) (Holmes) [*]Dual-Axis alignment (1e) [*]Classes: Druid, Monk, Paladin, Ranger (1e) [*]Races: Gnome, Half-Elf, Half-Orc (1e) [*]Class: Bard (2e) [*]Subclasses (Kits) (2e) [*]Universal "d20, roll high" resolution mechanic (3e) [*]3 (-4) -> 18 (+4) bonus table (3e) [*]No restrictions race/class choices (3e) [*]Feats (3e) [*]Skills (3e) [*]Standardized multiclassing (3e) [*]Classes: Barbarian, Sorcerer (3e) [*]"Short Rest" and "Long Rest" recovery mechanics (4e) [*]Class: Warlock (4e) [*]Races: Dragonborn, Tiefling, Drow (4e) [/LIST] There have been minor adjustments to various subsystems along the way, such as Wildshape becoming more and more of a core feature of the Druid class, or a class's spellcasting being improved (most recently Bards, Paladins, Rangers, but earlier including Clerics and Druids) but the game is honestly starting to settle down. They tried radically rewriting the game with 4e, and it landed like a lead balloon with the majority of the audience. So 5th-Edition was more like a "4th-Edition - take 2!" that shared much more of its DNA with 3e and the editions before it - which is, I suspect, why they initially resisted actually labeling it "Fifth Edition." And, as I pointed out in my earlier post, the classification of "3rd-Edition" as such is at least moderately suspect. I honestly don't think Hasbro wants to keep making "New Editions" (TM), so much as just augment the game with supplements they can sell, and just do a revised printing of the PHB/DMG/MM (when it's called for) that modifies things they've learned don't work the way they want them to, or introduces things they want to try out, and just includes a few "changes since the last printing" sidebars. Going forward, the game is just [I]Dungeons & Dragons[/I]. But if you insist on Edition labeling, I guess you can think of the 2024 books as Edition 5.2 or 5.3. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The impending mess that will be backwards compatibility
Top