D&D 4E The internet: 4E can't have it both ways

Should the internet community feedback affect 4E design?

  • No, feedback from the internet community should NOT be used to impact 4E design

    Votes: 57 29.2%
  • Yes, the internet community is integral to 4E and its feedback should have an impact on 4E design.

    Votes: 138 70.8%

Hobo said:
Well, that's quite a bit different than, "I can't vote on this poll because you forgot to check the 'multiple options' box." All that would have done is allowed you to vote both yes and no at the same time, which would have been an even more terribly constructed poll.

If you're going to write in an opinion, write one in, don't just give in to the temptation to pile on snark.

broghammerj said:
So write in your option! You've commented three times with no actual insight into your thoughts. I've been dying to know what makes Dr. Awkward tick. :D

You may have not noticed that my opinion is "both," as suggested by my first post...there being two options...me asking for multiple options...etc.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


maggot said:
I voted "yes" with the caveat that the internet opinion should be given its proper weight (which is far less than the internet opinion generally thinks it should be).
Same here.
I'd also like to add that the internet opinion should have slightly more weight related to feedback about the D&D Insider content & tools because it'll be more representative of the kind of players who are likely to use / be interested in it.

I cannot imagine many people subscribing to the DDI who don't read/post at least somewhat frequently on the WotC forums.
 

I voted YES.

If the community screams about names and the like, they should listen, because it can't break the game. BUT if there are people whining about some ability/rule/etc. that seems broken, without knowing all the rules, they should not listen.
 

Remove ads

Top