Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Battlestar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darrin Drader" data-source="post: 1259617" data-attributes="member: 7394"><p>I think they knew that they were going to alienate a good number of the fans, and I don't think they care so much. As far as I'm concerned there are two ways that a franchise can go. You can start making it for the fans, or you can keep the control in some other place. In BSGs case, I think the control is spread out a mile wide and two inches deep, but they are insisting that that's where the control is. The producers aren't as interested in making the TOS fans happy as they are in drawing new viewers into the fold. With this miniseries, they're targetting the B5 fans, the Farscape fans, yes the Star Wars fans, and then the fans of the other minor space operas like Andromeda, etc. They're baiting the hook with a known brand name (Battlestar Galactica), and the promise that this is going to be some really kick butt, action packed science fiction. They're definitely more interested in making money that satisfying the few die-hard loyal fans that are out there</p><p></p><p>Now, I really don't see that as all that bad, to be honest. The fact is that if you made a series (mini-series, movie, whatever) designed to appeal only to the loyal fans of the original, it would be a ratings flop. In order for this to succeed, it has to find a new audience, and that involves changing some things. Did they change too many things? Possibly, but I'm still willing to give it a chance, Ultimately it all comes down to business, and this is the business of entertainment in the 21st century. Love it or leave it (hmm, why is it that I don't watch much TV anymore???)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darrin Drader, post: 1259617, member: 7394"] I think they knew that they were going to alienate a good number of the fans, and I don't think they care so much. As far as I'm concerned there are two ways that a franchise can go. You can start making it for the fans, or you can keep the control in some other place. In BSGs case, I think the control is spread out a mile wide and two inches deep, but they are insisting that that's where the control is. The producers aren't as interested in making the TOS fans happy as they are in drawing new viewers into the fold. With this miniseries, they're targetting the B5 fans, the Farscape fans, yes the Star Wars fans, and then the fans of the other minor space operas like Andromeda, etc. They're baiting the hook with a known brand name (Battlestar Galactica), and the promise that this is going to be some really kick butt, action packed science fiction. They're definitely more interested in making money that satisfying the few die-hard loyal fans that are out there Now, I really don't see that as all that bad, to be honest. The fact is that if you made a series (mini-series, movie, whatever) designed to appeal only to the loyal fans of the original, it would be a ratings flop. In order for this to succeed, it has to find a new audience, and that involves changing some things. Did they change too many things? Possibly, but I'm still willing to give it a chance, Ultimately it all comes down to business, and this is the business of entertainment in the 21st century. Love it or leave it (hmm, why is it that I don't watch much TV anymore???) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Battlestar
Top