Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Battlestar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightPhoenix" data-source="post: 1259701" data-attributes="member: 115"><p>Man, I think I agree with you 100%.</p><p> </p><p>Sci-Fi fans also tend to believe that they are the center of the entertainment world, and the fact is that they're a <em>very</em> small minority. For all that Star Wars is a cultural phenomena and LotR is kicking butt in the box office right now, the number of people that have watched even <em>Star Trek</em> is abysmally low in comparison. The fact is (unfortunately) that sci-fi shows cost a lot to make, and need good numbers to make back money spent on the show. The original BSG <em>probably</em> would not have brought in those numbers.</p><p> </p><p>Do I think they changed too much? Yeah, I do. Do I have high hopes? No, I don't. I like Ron Moore's work a lot (especially on <em>Carnivale</em>), but fembots? Come on. I agree with a lot of what he's said in interviews, but I don't think you need to make the Cylons look human to make them seem human.</p><p> </p><p>Then there's another point no one's mentioned here (and I apologize if you did and I missed it). Moore's probably working with an extremely small budget - hence human-looking Cylons. SFC has been known to "request" changes to appeal to the rapidly shrinking male 18-35 audience. And as someone <em>did</em> mention above, there's too many fingers in the pie. So blaming this on Moore or the writers may be pointing the finger at the wrong place. Maybe they thought they were going to have the opportunity to make the show they wanted to make, and it got lost in the shuffle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightPhoenix, post: 1259701, member: 115"] Man, I think I agree with you 100%. Sci-Fi fans also tend to believe that they are the center of the entertainment world, and the fact is that they're a [i]very[/i] small minority. For all that Star Wars is a cultural phenomena and LotR is kicking butt in the box office right now, the number of people that have watched even [i]Star Trek[/i] is abysmally low in comparison. The fact is (unfortunately) that sci-fi shows cost a lot to make, and need good numbers to make back money spent on the show. The original BSG [i]probably[/i] would not have brought in those numbers. Do I think they changed too much? Yeah, I do. Do I have high hopes? No, I don't. I like Ron Moore's work a lot (especially on [i]Carnivale[/i]), but fembots? Come on. I agree with a lot of what he's said in interviews, but I don't think you need to make the Cylons look human to make them seem human. Then there's another point no one's mentioned here (and I apologize if you did and I missed it). Moore's probably working with an extremely small budget - hence human-looking Cylons. SFC has been known to "request" changes to appeal to the rapidly shrinking male 18-35 audience. And as someone [i]did[/i] mention above, there's too many fingers in the pie. So blaming this on Moore or the writers may be pointing the finger at the wrong place. Maybe they thought they were going to have the opportunity to make the show they wanted to make, and it got lost in the shuffle. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Battlestar
Top