Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Battlestar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jdavis" data-source="post: 1262573" data-attributes="member: 8704"><p>Yes and hasn't that really turned out to be a disaster for the franchise as a whole? It's polarized the Star Trek community and ratings have been less than stellar for the show. </p><p> </p><p>There really shouldn't be any suprise for these people that Galactica is getting hammered by this fan group, they have been getting hammered on the issue ever since the script leaked out last February. Sci Fi channel started editing out messageboard post of people wanting the old cast last March. Once again Sci Fi channel handled a public perception problem poorly. It really wouldn't of taken much to get these people to give the new show a shot and instead they alienated and ignored them, the 18 to 25 year old demographic was more important than the shows actual long term fans. </p><p> </p><p> How do you know a show more geared to the original would of lost money? There were three different projects in the works geared to a continuation story (Including the Tom DeSanto/Bryan Singer project that was the original Sci Fi miniseries project <a href="http://www.cylon.org/bsg/desanto-revival01.html" target="_blank">http://www.cylon.org/bsg/desanto-revival01.html</a> and the Richard Hatch project: <a href="http://www.cylon.org/bsg/bsg-2come-01.html" target="_blank">http://www.cylon.org/bsg/bsg-2come-01.html</a> ). The new show managed to leave a large portion of the old fans behind and it remains to be seen how the ratings will go. It wasn't that bad (I didn't like it but I will give it that much) but there is no way of knowing how a continuation story would of done to say it would of been a failure the same goes for a remake of the original that wasn't a complete and total reimagining of the story. Myself I really wonder why they even bothered calling this Battlestar Galactica so much was changed it wouldn't of been that much of a stretch to change the names and a couple of ship designs and call it something else entirely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jdavis, post: 1262573, member: 8704"] Yes and hasn't that really turned out to be a disaster for the franchise as a whole? It's polarized the Star Trek community and ratings have been less than stellar for the show. There really shouldn't be any suprise for these people that Galactica is getting hammered by this fan group, they have been getting hammered on the issue ever since the script leaked out last February. Sci Fi channel started editing out messageboard post of people wanting the old cast last March. Once again Sci Fi channel handled a public perception problem poorly. It really wouldn't of taken much to get these people to give the new show a shot and instead they alienated and ignored them, the 18 to 25 year old demographic was more important than the shows actual long term fans. How do you know a show more geared to the original would of lost money? There were three different projects in the works geared to a continuation story (Including the Tom DeSanto/Bryan Singer project that was the original Sci Fi miniseries project [url="http://www.cylon.org/bsg/desanto-revival01.html"]http://www.cylon.org/bsg/desanto-revival01.html[/url] and the Richard Hatch project: [url="http://www.cylon.org/bsg/bsg-2come-01.html"]http://www.cylon.org/bsg/bsg-2come-01.html[/url] ). The new show managed to leave a large portion of the old fans behind and it remains to be seen how the ratings will go. It wasn't that bad (I didn't like it but I will give it that much) but there is no way of knowing how a continuation story would of done to say it would of been a failure the same goes for a remake of the original that wasn't a complete and total reimagining of the story. Myself I really wonder why they even bothered calling this Battlestar Galactica so much was changed it wouldn't of been that much of a stretch to change the names and a couple of ship designs and call it something else entirely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Battlestar
Top