Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7898652" data-attributes="member: 22779">I guess.&nbsp; It must be incredibly frustrating for designers to be so easily dismissed just because they don't have a WotC logo on their product.&nbsp; A lot of those 3pp books are excellent.&nbsp; You can easily spot the works of love out there.&nbsp; Yet, just because they aren't official, they get completely ignored.&nbsp; It's like the complaints that 5e doesn't have enough short modules.&nbsp; Good grief, DM's guild must have well over a thousand 5e modules.&nbsp; More modules that some entire editions had, but, again, because they don't have that WotC stamp on them, they're dismissed.A quick google search turns up this thread from 2017[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.enworld.org/threads/list-the-third-party-5th-edition-campaign-settings.582787/[/URL]That's 24 settings right there and that list is two years old.&nbsp; How many settings do folks want?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7898652, member: 22779"] I guess. It must be incredibly frustrating for designers to be so easily dismissed just because they don't have a WotC logo on their product. A lot of those 3pp books are excellent. You can easily spot the works of love out there. Yet, just because they aren't official, they get completely ignored. It's like the complaints that 5e doesn't have enough short modules. Good grief, DM's guild must have well over a thousand 5e modules. More modules that some entire editions had, but, again, because they don't have that WotC stamp on them, they're dismissed. A quick google search turns up this thread from 2017 [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.enworld.org/threads/list-the-third-party-5th-edition-campaign-settings.582787/[/URL] That's 24 settings right there and that list is two years old. How many settings do folks want? [/QUOTE]

Verification