Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="historian" data-source="post: 2222208" data-attributes="member: 13438">Agree w/U_K.I've noticed a strong bit of negativity in this thread lately, and it's frankly embarrasing.&nbsp; While U_K has (by his own admission) missed deadlines, I believe any failure there is largely self-imposed in the hopes that he delivers something that better gels with 3.5 ed.'s crunchy rules.&nbsp; Nevertheless, I haven't noticed a material alteration to the concept since the inception of his posts.&nbsp; While I wish as much as anyone that U_K would release everything, even if only in draft form, I understand his reasons for not doing so.Apparently, Dyson's intent is to either: (1) light a fire under U_K's rear so that things are wrapped up (understandable from a thematic standpoint); or to (2) simply detract from U_K's considerable efforts to date and the IH generally (wholly unjustifiable).Dyson, if you have anything constructive to add, I (and I suspect everyone frequenting this post) would love to view it.&nbsp; Otherwise, as a serious viewer of the substantive material in this thread, I would appreciate if you declined to share it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="historian, post: 2222208, member: 13438"] Agree w/U_K. I've noticed a strong bit of negativity in this thread lately, and it's frankly embarrasing. While U_K has (by his own admission) missed deadlines, I believe any failure there is largely self-imposed in the hopes that he delivers something that better gels with 3.5 ed.'s crunchy rules. Nevertheless, I haven't noticed a material alteration to the [I]concept[/I] since the inception of his posts. While I wish as much as anyone that U_K would release everything, even if only in draft form, I understand his reasons for not doing so. Apparently, Dyson's intent is to either: (1) light a fire under U_K's rear so that things are wrapped up (understandable from a thematic standpoint); or to (2) simply detract from U_K's considerable efforts to date and the IH generally (wholly unjustifiable). Dyson, if you have anything constructive to add, I (and I suspect everyone frequenting this post) would love to view it. Otherwise, as a serious viewer of the substantive material in this thread, I would appreciate if you declined to share it. [/QUOTE]

Verification