Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Star Trek movie is...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shilsen" data-source="post: 4788571" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>I was waiting for you to say that <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>True, but I don't think it's asking too much to ask the movie to be at least a little thoughtful, which I really didn't find it to be at all. And that's something I'd ask of it anyway, irrespective of the original series, because I really don't expect or want a really faithful rendition of the original. I suspect that's one of the major variations between your expectation/desire of it and mine, hence the difference in opinion. After all, as you said</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For me, getting the characters right really wasn't enough (I'm also not convinced they got Spock right, but that's another matter) for me to really like it. That would help me enjoy the movie, and it did, but for me to consider it to be really good, the movie had to stand on its own merits too. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Heh. I just like there to be a little more to women than looking pretty (or men, for that matter). In this movie, there wasn't. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll agree about Uhura in TOS, but having a woman (especially a woman of color) doing any job on the bridge was a big step forward when TOS came out. And I didn't see any real updating here. Uhura in this movie does absolutely nothing useful, besides translating a little Romulan. She's also apparently a shoulder for Spock to cry on and something for Kirk to eye and grope, but that's hardly what I'd consider a well-rounded character. Sure, a couple of characters say she's really good at her job, but she actually does nothing, so the character references are meaningless. Admittedly she does more than Bones, whose usefulness apparently ends once he gets Kirk on the Enterprise, but that's not saying much. </p><p></p><p>BTW, for a damn good take on the one-sided treatment of gender in the movie, check out the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/may/11/star-trek-jjabrams-sexism" target="_blank">Warp Factor Sex</a> review on the Guardian. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks. Just don't make me watch the movie again. Which is a very easy way for me to judge whether I really like a movie or not. I was thinking today that I'd happily watch The Wrath of Khan again, and I've already seen it thrice. But the new Star Trek? Nope.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shilsen, post: 4788571, member: 198"] I was waiting for you to say that :) True, but I don't think it's asking too much to ask the movie to be at least a little thoughtful, which I really didn't find it to be at all. And that's something I'd ask of it anyway, irrespective of the original series, because I really don't expect or want a really faithful rendition of the original. I suspect that's one of the major variations between your expectation/desire of it and mine, hence the difference in opinion. After all, as you said For me, getting the characters right really wasn't enough (I'm also not convinced they got Spock right, but that's another matter) for me to really like it. That would help me enjoy the movie, and it did, but for me to consider it to be really good, the movie had to stand on its own merits too. Heh. I just like there to be a little more to women than looking pretty (or men, for that matter). In this movie, there wasn't. I'll agree about Uhura in TOS, but having a woman (especially a woman of color) doing any job on the bridge was a big step forward when TOS came out. And I didn't see any real updating here. Uhura in this movie does absolutely nothing useful, besides translating a little Romulan. She's also apparently a shoulder for Spock to cry on and something for Kirk to eye and grope, but that's hardly what I'd consider a well-rounded character. Sure, a couple of characters say she's really good at her job, but she actually does nothing, so the character references are meaningless. Admittedly she does more than Bones, whose usefulness apparently ends once he gets Kirk on the Enterprise, but that's not saying much. BTW, for a damn good take on the one-sided treatment of gender in the movie, check out the [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/may/11/star-trek-jjabrams-sexism]Warp Factor Sex[/url] review on the Guardian. Thanks. Just don't make me watch the movie again. Which is a very easy way for me to judge whether I really like a movie or not. I was thinking today that I'd happily watch The Wrath of Khan again, and I've already seen it thrice. But the new Star Trek? Nope. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The new Star Trek movie is...
Top