Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Paladin naming convention
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gorgoroth" data-source="post: 6104858" data-attributes="member: 6674889"><p>I voted for Knight as the superclass name, but I also prefer Champion.</p><p></p><p>A Cavalier / Paladin / Knight champion of justice sounds awesome. Spend all your character customization options to really get the full she-bang of "Knight in Shining Armor". But in games where horses are few and far between, or you just don't plan on using your horse much, I think Cavalier could be skipped. (though the subclasses should still have a supernatural method of summoning their mounts, it's just that the cavalier specialty would confer additional combat maneuvers / bonuses or skills while ahorse).</p><p></p><p>I also wanted to say, it appears as though, from Mearls' podcast, that many of the better suggestions from this forum, such as Ws instead of MDDs, have made it into the game. Keep it up! We'll have a workable set of rules soon at this rate, ones that strike a good balance of useability and common sense while avoiding pitfalls in other editions. I read some of the comments on the Wotc site and there are quite a few people there who say that e.g. daggers should do the same damage as a greatsword. Ugh, I'm glad they're not designing this game and their "gear is mere fluff" mentality has not polluted DDN. In fact, I think Enworld's comments and debates about these things has led to a great many improvements that I directly see applied to what they've mentioned in the playtests, if not exactly, then at least addressing our concerns in new and creative ways. E.g. how to make rangers distinct from a fighter + specialty + background. </p><p></p><p>I have similar hope as a result that they'll adjust the Paladin superclass name to Champion (or Knight would work too, though I think that would be better as a paragon path / prestige class). To be a knight, you first have to be a squire, right? Earn your title, don't start at level 1 with it. Knight sounds more like a veteran paladin or fighter prestige class to me, and not something you could simply chose to be from the start. Prove your valour!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gorgoroth, post: 6104858, member: 6674889"] I voted for Knight as the superclass name, but I also prefer Champion. A Cavalier / Paladin / Knight champion of justice sounds awesome. Spend all your character customization options to really get the full she-bang of "Knight in Shining Armor". But in games where horses are few and far between, or you just don't plan on using your horse much, I think Cavalier could be skipped. (though the subclasses should still have a supernatural method of summoning their mounts, it's just that the cavalier specialty would confer additional combat maneuvers / bonuses or skills while ahorse). I also wanted to say, it appears as though, from Mearls' podcast, that many of the better suggestions from this forum, such as Ws instead of MDDs, have made it into the game. Keep it up! We'll have a workable set of rules soon at this rate, ones that strike a good balance of useability and common sense while avoiding pitfalls in other editions. I read some of the comments on the Wotc site and there are quite a few people there who say that e.g. daggers should do the same damage as a greatsword. Ugh, I'm glad they're not designing this game and their "gear is mere fluff" mentality has not polluted DDN. In fact, I think Enworld's comments and debates about these things has led to a great many improvements that I directly see applied to what they've mentioned in the playtests, if not exactly, then at least addressing our concerns in new and creative ways. E.g. how to make rangers distinct from a fighter + specialty + background. I have similar hope as a result that they'll adjust the Paladin superclass name to Champion (or Knight would work too, though I think that would be better as a paragon path / prestige class). To be a knight, you first have to be a squire, right? Earn your title, don't start at level 1 with it. Knight sounds more like a veteran paladin or fighter prestige class to me, and not something you could simply chose to be from the start. Prove your valour!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Paladin naming convention
Top