Wormwood
Adventurer
Exactly.Did anyone who actually plays 4e feel insulted? If not, then WotC has not insulted it's customers.
Exactly.Did anyone who actually plays 4e feel insulted? If not, then WotC has not insulted it's customers.
What are you trying to say? That they insulted M:tG fans?WotC is bigger than 4e.
WotC is bigger than 4e.
<begin rant>
What are you trying to say? That they insulted M:tG fans?
Do you really think those are the only two questions?It seems to me the value of this flash cartoon re: marketing should be debated by asking the questions: 1) Did it attract New Customers? 2) Did it drive away potential Customers?
While I'm sure that you and your two friends are part of any statistic, it's silly to think that most people think like you do.Thus I know of those who have less interest in supporting WotC as a company because of this. I ask again, has this brought in any new customers? If not, it’s a loss, marketing wise.
Can we please all get past this now and move on to talking about what we do like about our hobby, and get back to providing advice to each other that can make all of our games and game experiences better.
No, there are plenty of other questions. But unless WotC is recieving an income based upon web-page hits, then they, IMO, are probably the most relevant in terms of marketing success.Do you really think those are the only two questions?
You're talking about marketing as if you know something about it.
While I'm sure that you and your two friends are part of any statistic, it's silly to think that most people think like you do.
You're not being held captive in this thread. If some people want to continue talking about this topic, that's all well and good. There are plenty of other threads for you to participate in elsewhere.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.