Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Rogue: Are skills enough?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 6043777" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>The debate currently rages between the rogue and the fighter.</p><p></p><p>The key surrounds the rogue's sneak attack. It is now a more specific damage bonus compared to the fighter's deadly strike. But its equal in damage, meaning that the rogue on his best day can only match the fighter in strength, but cannot surpass him.</p><p></p><p>This is big change compared to 3e and 4e rogues, where a well run rogue was a damage king on the battlefield. And as all big changes do, it has caused a lot of controversy.</p><p></p><p>But this controversy actually speaks to another debate that has occurred for several editions now.....what is the role of the skills system?</p><p></p><p></p><p>In 4e, skills were present, but were generally put on the backburner compared to powers and class abilities. </p><p></p><p>5e (so far) in its attempt to reduce complexity and provide flexibility, has pushed a lot of the weight back on the skills system. The idea being that I don't need special abilities to perform actions, I have a suite of skills that can handle all of those actions and more. This requires more DM interpretation, but this too was a stated goal of 5e.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Many who look at the rogue right now site its lack of combat damage and combat abilities and declare it a "fighter lite" (I myself am guilty of this declaration as well).</p><p></p><p>But the rogue does have a unique ability all of its own, its skill bonus maneuver. Presentation wise, its a little hidden, its not put on the class sheet in bold letters like sneak attack once was....but yet it is an ability unique to rogue, at least this far.</p><p></p><p>This ability is actually quite strong, a rogue can net a +10 bonus to a skill at 10th level...a bonus no one else seems close to getting. Rogue's appear right now to be the king of skills by a solid margin.</p><p></p><p>So getting back to combat, if combat is intended to be about attack rolls and class abilities, than the rogue does fall short. But if combat is intended to be a hallmark of skill use for dodging, climbing, tumbling, disabling etc....then the rogue seems to have a unique advantage all his own.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So what do we want as a community? Do we want skill use to be considered important enough to be a factor in combat power....or should we return to combat specific abilities as the primary drive for such?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 6043777, member: 5889"] The debate currently rages between the rogue and the fighter. The key surrounds the rogue's sneak attack. It is now a more specific damage bonus compared to the fighter's deadly strike. But its equal in damage, meaning that the rogue on his best day can only match the fighter in strength, but cannot surpass him. This is big change compared to 3e and 4e rogues, where a well run rogue was a damage king on the battlefield. And as all big changes do, it has caused a lot of controversy. But this controversy actually speaks to another debate that has occurred for several editions now.....what is the role of the skills system? In 4e, skills were present, but were generally put on the backburner compared to powers and class abilities. 5e (so far) in its attempt to reduce complexity and provide flexibility, has pushed a lot of the weight back on the skills system. The idea being that I don't need special abilities to perform actions, I have a suite of skills that can handle all of those actions and more. This requires more DM interpretation, but this too was a stated goal of 5e. Many who look at the rogue right now site its lack of combat damage and combat abilities and declare it a "fighter lite" (I myself am guilty of this declaration as well). But the rogue does have a unique ability all of its own, its skill bonus maneuver. Presentation wise, its a little hidden, its not put on the class sheet in bold letters like sneak attack once was....but yet it is an ability unique to rogue, at least this far. This ability is actually quite strong, a rogue can net a +10 bonus to a skill at 10th level...a bonus no one else seems close to getting. Rogue's appear right now to be the king of skills by a solid margin. So getting back to combat, if combat is intended to be about attack rolls and class abilities, than the rogue does fall short. But if combat is intended to be a hallmark of skill use for dodging, climbing, tumbling, disabling etc....then the rogue seems to have a unique advantage all his own. So what do we want as a community? Do we want skill use to be considered important enough to be a factor in combat power....or should we return to combat specific abilities as the primary drive for such? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Rogue: Are skills enough?
Top