Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 3262012" data-attributes="member: 1288">Wow. Um, let's see...1) Yep.2) I suppose it is, a bit, though it's also meant to serve a slightly different purpose. But not all spells and mysteries are meant to be entirely equal.3) As with similar spells (i.e. wall of fire), the answer is B.4) The spell stat block is correct; it's an area effect. The "touch" reference is a typo.5) When I wrote it, I intended minutes. The table was changed to rounds in development; I assume the reference to "minutes" in the text was left by accident. Also when I wrote it, there was difficulties assigned to the different types of information, and failure by more than 5 on the roll indicated misleading info. Since those were removed, I suppose it's up to you decide if the misleading info occurs on a successful save, or under other circumstances. (Perhaps a save that succeeds by more than a certain amount would be appropriate.)6) Correct. The save requires an action, and occurs on the target's initiative.7) Yes, the -4 applies.8) I don't see why not. You spent the feat slots on metashadow feats, so I'd say they ought to apply.9) Correct. The mystery would take a full-round, due to the maximize, but is not further lengthened by the others.10) I'd want to see them playtested before I said for certain. But my guess is, anything that works as a metamagic feat probably could be transformed into a metashadow feat, using the existing metashadow feats as models.</blockquote>

Verification