Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Three Musketeers (2011)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 5716808" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>Had a big, detailed review all typed out and then I clicked to close the wrong open window and lost it all. Le sigh.</p><p> </p><p>Short version is that it's <em>adequate</em> as an action movie in the same way that the Resident Evil movies are adequate as action/horror. It is an AWFUL adaptation of the original source material. It was not an original script so much as one that was cut/pasted using lines from dozens of other movies of all kinds. Lots of recycled dialogue. Okay fight scenes. Great effects - all LOOKING good, but simultaneously looking very NOT real, if you get what I'm saying. Shallow characterization in the script, too much wooden acting (though they all have so little to really DO or SAY anyway). Definitely over-the-top action and NOT swashbuckling.</p><p> </p><p>I saw it in 3D. Well, it was SUPPOSED to be in 3D anyway. As soon as it started you could see something was totally WRONG about the 3D effects. About 20 minutes in I figured out that they had loaded the film backwards - which is to say that the left image was projected from the right, the right image was projected left and the polarizing glasses were causing the two images to overlap - any scene with deep background was bleeding through foreground images with foreground trying to bury itself in the background. Had to wear the 3D glasses UPSIDE DOWN through the whole movie to get the images to merge correctly. Went to complain but of course at that point there's nothing to do but let the film run its course and fix it for the next show. Of course the projectionist spent 10-15 minutes shutting off one projector then another while he tried to figure out how CATASTROPHICALLY he'd f'd up. Which, of course, forced us to keep taking our glasses off and on to see anything that didn't cause brain hemorrhaging.</p><p> </p><p>And I STILL managed to find it reasonably enjoyable. Maybe I was just that entertained by the whole affair as a relative disaster.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 5716808, member: 32740"] Had a big, detailed review all typed out and then I clicked to close the wrong open window and lost it all. Le sigh. Short version is that it's [I]adequate[/I] as an action movie in the same way that the Resident Evil movies are adequate as action/horror. It is an AWFUL adaptation of the original source material. It was not an original script so much as one that was cut/pasted using lines from dozens of other movies of all kinds. Lots of recycled dialogue. Okay fight scenes. Great effects - all LOOKING good, but simultaneously looking very NOT real, if you get what I'm saying. Shallow characterization in the script, too much wooden acting (though they all have so little to really DO or SAY anyway). Definitely over-the-top action and NOT swashbuckling. I saw it in 3D. Well, it was SUPPOSED to be in 3D anyway. As soon as it started you could see something was totally WRONG about the 3D effects. About 20 minutes in I figured out that they had loaded the film backwards - which is to say that the left image was projected from the right, the right image was projected left and the polarizing glasses were causing the two images to overlap - any scene with deep background was bleeding through foreground images with foreground trying to bury itself in the background. Had to wear the 3D glasses UPSIDE DOWN through the whole movie to get the images to merge correctly. Went to complain but of course at that point there's nothing to do but let the film run its course and fix it for the next show. Of course the projectionist spent 10-15 minutes shutting off one projector then another while he tried to figure out how CATASTROPHICALLY he'd f'd up. Which, of course, forced us to keep taking our glasses off and on to see anything that didn't cause brain hemorrhaging. And I STILL managed to find it reasonably enjoyable. Maybe I was just that entertained by the whole affair as a relative disaster. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Three Musketeers (2011)
Top