Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
The Usage of the Non-Sequitur "4e is a Tactical Skirmish Game"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 5983573" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>This is for 4e advocates only. This is a public poll. </p><p></p><p>I'm curious. On the internet, when someone quips "4e is <just/merely> a <glorified or other> Tactical Skirmish Game", what do you think the intent is by the user?</p><p></p><p>The purpose of this poll is to gather information on if, in the eyes of the userbase, this is a potentially constructive angle of pursuit within dialogue or if it is reflexively off-putting to the point that it is destructive to dialogue. Therefore, I want the percentage of people who think its in "good faith" and/or constructive (choice 1) versus "bad faith" (choice 2 through 4). Pick just one (yes, I know multiple may apply but I just want "reflexive first thought" and I don't want the evaluation to be muddled through multiple choice.</p><p></p><p>Finally, yes, I know that people can just ignore the statement or detach their feelings. There is always conflict resolution to any problem that puts the locus of control within the confines of the "receiver's behavior." That is orthogonal to the issue at hand here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 5983573, member: 6696971"] This is for 4e advocates only. This is a public poll. I'm curious. On the internet, when someone quips "4e is <just/merely> a <glorified or other> Tactical Skirmish Game", what do you think the intent is by the user? The purpose of this poll is to gather information on if, in the eyes of the userbase, this is a potentially constructive angle of pursuit within dialogue or if it is reflexively off-putting to the point that it is destructive to dialogue. Therefore, I want the percentage of people who think its in "good faith" and/or constructive (choice 1) versus "bad faith" (choice 2 through 4). Pick just one (yes, I know multiple may apply but I just want "reflexive first thought" and I don't want the evaluation to be muddled through multiple choice. Finally, yes, I know that people can just ignore the statement or detach their feelings. There is always conflict resolution to any problem that puts the locus of control within the confines of the "receiver's behavior." That is orthogonal to the issue at hand here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
The Usage of the Non-Sequitur "4e is a Tactical Skirmish Game"
Top