Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Usage of the Non-Sequitur "4e is a Tactical Skirmish Game"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 5983921" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>I disagree completely. See Morrus's post above and my immediately prior post. It is not that the survey is weighted, it is that the statement "4e is <just> a Tactical Skirmish Game" is loaded by its very nature (see my above post). In effect, it is saying that the ruleset, with regards to RPGing (our hobby), is shallow and trite and cannot incorporate actual RPGing (hence people using it interchangably with "4e is not an RPG."). That statement then, by proxy, transfers the weight of the implication onto the advocates; "when playing 4e, you are not an RPGer". The fact that the statement is loaded with 1st order and 2nd order implications is not within the locus of control of a poll asking about the reflexive response of those who are dealing with the loaded statement. Further, there are only so many motives that will underwrite such a statement on an internet message board (whose express purpose is to exchange ideas about our hobby in a congenial, polite, respectful fashion). I feel that the poll canvasses them; (i) persuade in good faith, (ii) gratuitously provoke, (iii) share in communion with like-minded thinkers (preach to the choir), (iv) achieve catharsis through celebration of the statement as a statement unto itself (high-fiving with those you share fellowship or merely opining to socially cavort or read your words on the internet). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is a good question and may provide an answer that may be illuminating. However, again, that is a completely separate question and not the question I wanted answered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 5983921, member: 6696971"] I disagree completely. See Morrus's post above and my immediately prior post. It is not that the survey is weighted, it is that the statement "4e is <just> a Tactical Skirmish Game" is loaded by its very nature (see my above post). In effect, it is saying that the ruleset, with regards to RPGing (our hobby), is shallow and trite and cannot incorporate actual RPGing (hence people using it interchangably with "4e is not an RPG."). That statement then, by proxy, transfers the weight of the implication onto the advocates; "when playing 4e, you are not an RPGer". The fact that the statement is loaded with 1st order and 2nd order implications is not within the locus of control of a poll asking about the reflexive response of those who are dealing with the loaded statement. Further, there are only so many motives that will underwrite such a statement on an internet message board (whose express purpose is to exchange ideas about our hobby in a congenial, polite, respectful fashion). I feel that the poll canvasses them; (i) persuade in good faith, (ii) gratuitously provoke, (iii) share in communion with like-minded thinkers (preach to the choir), (iv) achieve catharsis through celebration of the statement as a statement unto itself (high-fiving with those you share fellowship or merely opining to socially cavort or read your words on the internet). That is a good question and may provide an answer that may be illuminating. However, again, that is a completely separate question and not the question I wanted answered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Usage of the Non-Sequitur "4e is a Tactical Skirmish Game"
Top