Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
The Usage of the Non-Sequitur "4e is a Tactical Skirmish Game"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 5996253" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>I don't know. By all means, pose the poll. Regardless, someone saying "this mechanic is problematic to this playstyle or to pacing, etc and here is why" is a gaping chasm away from the inflammatory implications of "4e is just a tactical skirmish game...eg: "you are excluded from the club because your game is, by definition, not an RPG and apparently you are too stupid to know it." I'm pretty sure exchanging ideas about the specific impacts of mechanics on the fiction and playstyles is one of the primary reasons for having an RPG hobby message board. I'm also pretty sure that the exchange of ideas ends when commenter tells someone commenter that, in effect, they don't belong here and they might want to go post on a 'board game' website...but cannot (or will not) articulate why. Meanwhile the person being charged regales the charging party with play experience after play experience indicating legitimate RPGing that is antithetical to the statement of "4e is just a tactical skirmish game."</p><p></p><p>***</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. Meaning: I clicked the button stating "do you want to make this a public poll" which makes each commenters' vote visible to the public". Hence, public poll.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 5996253, member: 6696971"] I don't know. By all means, pose the poll. Regardless, someone saying "this mechanic is problematic to this playstyle or to pacing, etc and here is why" is a gaping chasm away from the inflammatory implications of "4e is just a tactical skirmish game...eg: "you are excluded from the club because your game is, by definition, not an RPG and apparently you are too stupid to know it." I'm pretty sure exchanging ideas about the specific impacts of mechanics on the fiction and playstyles is one of the primary reasons for having an RPG hobby message board. I'm also pretty sure that the exchange of ideas ends when commenter tells someone commenter that, in effect, they don't belong here and they might want to go post on a 'board game' website...but cannot (or will not) articulate why. Meanwhile the person being charged regales the charging party with play experience after play experience indicating legitimate RPGing that is antithetical to the statement of "4e is just a tactical skirmish game." *** Yes. Meaning: I clicked the button stating "do you want to make this a public poll" which makes each commenters' vote visible to the public". Hence, public poll. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
The Usage of the Non-Sequitur "4e is a Tactical Skirmish Game"
Top