Yes . . . which is my point. Sorry if I'm not being clear.Yes, climate change is an issue. But it's an issue we can solve more easily than we can colonise space or other worlds. Ultimately, the easiest planet to terraform is our own.
What other consumption is just gone? Here we launch materials away from earth, we cant get them all back.From a certain point of view the only actual cost of space exploration is the consumption of materials and the pollution produced as a byproduct of launches. The money spent goes into the pockets of people who live and work on Earth. Only the materials that get used up or launched into orbit are actually "gone" . And space exploration is less frivolous than most consumption.
Yes, but it feels good to cut programs!Plus, as previously noted, NASA is a net positive, economically. It pays for itself a couple times over, creates jobs, and all that. Cutting it without a specific, really good plan would make economic problems worse, not better.
It also feels good to go to the moon!Yes, but it feels good to cut programs!

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.