Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The 'Wonderland'-Inspired Faces of the RAGE OF DEMONS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 7670873" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>I can't quite grok how this is coming together for you, specifically from a simulationist's perspective. </p><p></p><p>Alignment in AD&D and 3.x are empirically testable, physical laws of the cosmos no different than gravitational attraction and the immediately observable effects of combustion (the production of heat and light).</p><p></p><p>I mean I suppose you could certainly rationalize ignorance from the layfolk's perspective (to some degree) as they (a) are generally distant from the cosmological certainty of alignment due to their fundamentally mundane existence (till fields, raise children, barter, etc) and (b) don't interface regularly (if at all) with the magical means of discernment nor the implications of said discernment. However, I don't see how you could do the same for adventurers or any collection of immortals (demons, devils, gods, etc) of which (a) and (b) above are 100 % inverted. Could you have a stray demon who is all "yea I don't buy that rot"...sure, I suppose. However, I can't imagine that his skepticism (whether he actually prosletyzed or just passively objected) would move the requsite number of units to be anything but the most extreme outlier without a shred of evidence to support his personal ethos.</p><p></p><p>Could these immortals/adventurers possibly have discussions about the utility (solely within the scope of their own personal needs) of each alignment? Sure, I could see that I suppose. But that isn't the same thing as denying the utterly inescapable cosmological fact that some entity (or entities) organized the universe such that behavioral profile x unerringly yields alignment y upon detection. And further, that said entity which organized universal laws has already rendered their, obviously authoritative as the creator-entity, judgement upon the cosmological nature and utility of each alignment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 7670873, member: 6696971"] I can't quite grok how this is coming together for you, specifically from a simulationist's perspective. Alignment in AD&D and 3.x are empirically testable, physical laws of the cosmos no different than gravitational attraction and the immediately observable effects of combustion (the production of heat and light). I mean I suppose you could certainly rationalize ignorance from the layfolk's perspective (to some degree) as they (a) are generally distant from the cosmological certainty of alignment due to their fundamentally mundane existence (till fields, raise children, barter, etc) and (b) don't interface regularly (if at all) with the magical means of discernment nor the implications of said discernment. However, I don't see how you could do the same for adventurers or any collection of immortals (demons, devils, gods, etc) of which (a) and (b) above are 100 % inverted. Could you have a stray demon who is all "yea I don't buy that rot"...sure, I suppose. However, I can't imagine that his skepticism (whether he actually prosletyzed or just passively objected) would move the requsite number of units to be anything but the most extreme outlier without a shred of evidence to support his personal ethos. Could these immortals/adventurers possibly have discussions about the utility (solely within the scope of their own personal needs) of each alignment? Sure, I could see that I suppose. But that isn't the same thing as denying the utterly inescapable cosmological fact that some entity (or entities) organized the universe such that behavioral profile x unerringly yields alignment y upon detection. And further, that said entity which organized universal laws has already rendered their, obviously authoritative as the creator-entity, judgement upon the cosmological nature and utility of each alignment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The 'Wonderland'-Inspired Faces of the RAGE OF DEMONS
Top