Enjoy your reading.devilish said:Very interested but, unfortunately, a complete beginner. I just picked up
ArM5 @ GenCon and am slowly working my way through it. I would happily
lurk until I get a full grasp of the rules and see how the PbP progresses.
-D
taitzu52 said:Wow. I'm blown away with your thoroughness, Yair. I've been playing Ars Magica since Lion Rampant originally made it (yes, I even still have 'Whimsy Cards'). But alas, I have not played for some time.
This being said, I am going to have to downdrade my 'maybe', to a very impressed but lurking, 'no'. I don't want to slow you down, and I hope you find some fans of this great game that are worthy of all your hard work. Good luck!
5e is similiar enough to previous editions that the same concepts can, usually, work in any edition. However, the problem with playing a magus is that you will need to reference the spellcasting rules which are sufficiently different that you may be off on level or even, rarely, arts. You will also suffer from not being privy to more subtle differences, like the way magic resistance and penetration works (spell roll-spell level=penetration), new mastery options (fast-casting, multicasting, no voice/gestures, and so on), ceremonial casting, and more; this will lead to suboptimal choices but I think won't be a big difficulty.MummyKitty said:I'd be interested in playing. I have some 3rd and 4th edition materials, but no 5th yet. I haven't played this much (only at cons), and haven't played a magi character yet. I would like to play a magi, maybe I can make one up with the 3rd or 4th edition and with your help "update" him? Or I'm happy to play mundane characters as well. Let me know what you'd prefer. Thanks!
I thought soTempletroll said:The poll was a good idea for attracting attention.![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.