Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Thief seems overpowered to this new/old DM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5481866" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Just to make this clear one more time - I wasn't ignoring DPR. I was using the base damage of the At-Wills because that seemed to be the numbers you were referring to. Hence why I acknowledged accuracy seperately. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I'm doubtful. By 3rd level, the Ranger has probably acquired a magic weapon and weapon focus (both bonuses counting double for him.) Same goes for any other boosts he may have to damage from items. And he now has two encounter powers that are significantly more potent than backstab. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Dailies give the capability to significantly boost damage in the course of a single fight. Measuring that out as DPR over the course of a day gives a false image of the real effect - reducing a tough fight by one or two rounds can be key. I'm not saying it singlehandedly overwhelms the Thief, but being able to use powers like this that sway single combats <em>is</em> a solid advantage for classes with daily powers. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Yeah, you are entirely correct here, not sure what I was thinking. </p><p> </p><p>So let's go with a Waraxe and figure out the proper numbers. I suspect you are ignoring the benefit of the ranger getting two attacks (and thus more chances to hit, more chances to use quarry, etc). </p><p> </p><p>Dwarven Ranger: Str 20, Dex 13, Con 13, Wis 12. Dwarven Hammer Training. Waraxe. Let's assume that, as a melee character, he'll get CA often but not always, and treat this as ~+1 to hit. Let's assume an enemy AC of 16. </p><p> </p><p>Twin Strike DPR: 14.915</p><p>[sblock]Twin Strike: +8 vs AC x 2: 1d12+2. +1d6 Quarry. </p><p> </p><p>1/400 chance of both attacks critting: 34 damage. </p><p>24/400 chance of one attack critting and one hitting: 28.5 damage.</p><p>14/400 chance of one attack critting and one missing: 20 damage.</p><p>144/400 chance of both attacks hitting: 20.5 damage.</p><p>168/400 chance of one attack hitting and one missing: 12 damage.</p><p>49/400 chance of both attacks miss: 0 damage.</p><p> </p><p>Two-Fanged Strike: Adds 5 damage per hit, plus 1 if both hit. DPR: 21.8375.</p><p> </p><p>5 Round combat: 81.4975 damage. </p><p>Thief, 5 round combat: 86.75 damage.[/sblock] </p><p>So, with combat advantage half the time, the melee ranger is a bit behind the thief - though 5 damage over the course of an entire combat isn't much. At the cost, admittedly, of having lower defenses. Over the next few levels, as the dwarf gets more bonuses to damage, he starts to come out ahead. </p><p> </p><p>[sblock]</p><p>Level 4 Dwarven Ranger: Dwarven Weapon Training, Axe Expertise, Weapon Focus, +1 Waraxes. Str 21, Dex 14, Wis 12. </p><p> </p><p>Twin Strike DPR: 19.67875</p><p>Twin Strike vs AC 19: +12 vs AC x 2: 1d12(B1)+4. +1d6 Quarry. </p><p> </p><p>1/400 chance of both attacks critting: 45 damage. </p><p>26/400 chance of one attack critting and one hitting: 36.5 damage.</p><p>12/400 chance of one attack critting and one missing: 25.5 damage.</p><p>169/400 chance of both attacks hitting: 25.5 damage.</p><p>156/400 chance of one attack hitting and one missing: 14.5 damage.</p><p>36/400 chance of both attacks miss: 0 damage.</p><p> </p><p>Two-Fanged Strike: Adds 5 damage per hit, plus 1 if both hit. DPR: 27.16875.</p><p>Avenging Charge: Add 17.575 damage once per combat.</p><p> </p><p>5 Round combat: 126.4575 damage.</p><p> </p><p>Level 4 Rogue, Dex 21, Light Blade Expertise, Weapon Focus, Backstabber, +1 Short Sword. </p><p>Basic Attack: +15 vs AC: 1d6+10+2d8 = 19.6 DPR</p><p>Backstab DPR: +18 vs AC: 2d6+10+2d8 = 25.4 DPR</p><p>5 Round combat: 109.6 damage. </p><p>[/sblock] </p><p>By level 4, the dwarven ranger (whose AC is now only 2 below the thief) does nearly 27 more damage each encounter - not counting daily powers. Twin Strike is now ahead of the thief on its own, and encounters provide a bigger buff than Backstab. The advantage presented from doubling damage bonuses and the versatility of encounter powers outweighs the simple static bonuses of the thief. </p><p> </p><p>Now, this <em>is</em> with a very optimized character. The thief has the very key advantage of doing excellent damage without much need to invest in the ideal build. But that doesn't change the fact that other characters can present the same damage output - or higher - as the thief. </p><p> </p><p>The thief has the brief advantage at level 1, mainly due to having one key damage boosting feat (backstabber) plus some early and effective class features. But it certainly doesn't take until late heroic or paragon for others to catch up. </p><p> </p><p>Let's also check in with the scout, since you dismissed that as well. </p><p> </p><p>Level 4 Scout</p><p>[sblock]Dex 20, Aspect of the Charging Ram/Lurking Spider, Spinning Axe Mastery, Axe Expertise, Double Axe Proficiency, Weapon Focus (Axe), +1 Double Axe. Let's assume he gets +1 to hit/+2 damage on the charge, and has CA for the follow-up attack. Assuming AC 19 for the enemy.</p><p> </p><p>Charge Attack: +12 vs AC 19: 1d10(B1)+11.</p><p>On a hit, Dual Weapon Attack: +13 vs AC 19: 1d10(B1)+9.</p><p> </p><p>1/20 chance of the first attack critting: 24.5 damage. </p><p>13/20 chance of the first attack hitting: 17 damage.</p><p>6/20 chance of the first attack missing: 0 damage.</p><p> </p><p>If the first attack hit (14/20 chance), 1/20 chance of second attack critting: 22.5 damage.</p><p>If the first attack hit, 13/20 chance of second attack hitting: 15 damage.</p><p>If the first attack hit, 6/20 chance of second attack missing: 0 damage.</p><p> </p><p>Average DPR: 19.8875</p><p>Twice per combat: Power Strike adds 5.5 damage. </p><p>5 round combat: 110.4375 damage.[/sblock] </p><p>Scout comes out on par with the thief by level 4. He doesn't always get his second attack, but gets it often enough that the damage bonuses definitely add up. </p><p> </p><p>Your standard Rogue is also moving ahead of the thief by this point, due to encounter powers. The Slayer does come in behind the Thief, but has added durability. Same for the Barbarian - though multitarget powers and rages can push him higher. And for the Sorcerer, though his DPR is below the rogue if attacking one target, it only takes two targets to come out ahead, and that's not even acknowledging encounter and daily powers. </p><p> </p><p>Like I said, I think the Thief is definitely a top-tier striker, and probably the easiest one to come optimized right out of the box. And, at level 1, does come out ahead of most strikers - though many builds are certainly in the same league. Claiming he kills an extra monster per combat than all other strikers <em>just isn't accurate</em>.</p><p> </p><p>And, just a few levels down the road, others begin to catch up. He remains competitive, especially at Paragon levels, but lacking daily powers and the versatility of chosen encounter powers... well, it definitely has an impact.</p><p> </p><p>You claimed he is always ahead of other strikers, and especially so at 1st level. The truth is that he is ahead of other strikers at 1st level, and is even with them - or behind them - at later levels. Either way, he is never so far ahead as to be in another league entirely - the class has its own strengths and weaknesses, and while undeniably effective and easy to play, it certainly doesn't outclass everyone else on the level you have been suggesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5481866, member: 61155"] Just to make this clear one more time - I wasn't ignoring DPR. I was using the base damage of the At-Wills because that seemed to be the numbers you were referring to. Hence why I acknowledged accuracy seperately. I'm doubtful. By 3rd level, the Ranger has probably acquired a magic weapon and weapon focus (both bonuses counting double for him.) Same goes for any other boosts he may have to damage from items. And he now has two encounter powers that are significantly more potent than backstab. Dailies give the capability to significantly boost damage in the course of a single fight. Measuring that out as DPR over the course of a day gives a false image of the real effect - reducing a tough fight by one or two rounds can be key. I'm not saying it singlehandedly overwhelms the Thief, but being able to use powers like this that sway single combats [I]is[/I] a solid advantage for classes with daily powers. Yeah, you are entirely correct here, not sure what I was thinking. So let's go with a Waraxe and figure out the proper numbers. I suspect you are ignoring the benefit of the ranger getting two attacks (and thus more chances to hit, more chances to use quarry, etc). Dwarven Ranger: Str 20, Dex 13, Con 13, Wis 12. Dwarven Hammer Training. Waraxe. Let's assume that, as a melee character, he'll get CA often but not always, and treat this as ~+1 to hit. Let's assume an enemy AC of 16. Twin Strike DPR: 14.915 [sblock]Twin Strike: +8 vs AC x 2: 1d12+2. +1d6 Quarry. 1/400 chance of both attacks critting: 34 damage. 24/400 chance of one attack critting and one hitting: 28.5 damage. 14/400 chance of one attack critting and one missing: 20 damage. 144/400 chance of both attacks hitting: 20.5 damage. 168/400 chance of one attack hitting and one missing: 12 damage. 49/400 chance of both attacks miss: 0 damage. Two-Fanged Strike: Adds 5 damage per hit, plus 1 if both hit. DPR: 21.8375. 5 Round combat: 81.4975 damage. Thief, 5 round combat: 86.75 damage.[/sblock] So, with combat advantage half the time, the melee ranger is a bit behind the thief - though 5 damage over the course of an entire combat isn't much. At the cost, admittedly, of having lower defenses. Over the next few levels, as the dwarf gets more bonuses to damage, he starts to come out ahead. [sblock] Level 4 Dwarven Ranger: Dwarven Weapon Training, Axe Expertise, Weapon Focus, +1 Waraxes. Str 21, Dex 14, Wis 12. Twin Strike DPR: 19.67875 Twin Strike vs AC 19: +12 vs AC x 2: 1d12(B1)+4. +1d6 Quarry. 1/400 chance of both attacks critting: 45 damage. 26/400 chance of one attack critting and one hitting: 36.5 damage. 12/400 chance of one attack critting and one missing: 25.5 damage. 169/400 chance of both attacks hitting: 25.5 damage. 156/400 chance of one attack hitting and one missing: 14.5 damage. 36/400 chance of both attacks miss: 0 damage. Two-Fanged Strike: Adds 5 damage per hit, plus 1 if both hit. DPR: 27.16875. Avenging Charge: Add 17.575 damage once per combat. 5 Round combat: 126.4575 damage. Level 4 Rogue, Dex 21, Light Blade Expertise, Weapon Focus, Backstabber, +1 Short Sword. Basic Attack: +15 vs AC: 1d6+10+2d8 = 19.6 DPR Backstab DPR: +18 vs AC: 2d6+10+2d8 = 25.4 DPR 5 Round combat: 109.6 damage. [/sblock] By level 4, the dwarven ranger (whose AC is now only 2 below the thief) does nearly 27 more damage each encounter - not counting daily powers. Twin Strike is now ahead of the thief on its own, and encounters provide a bigger buff than Backstab. The advantage presented from doubling damage bonuses and the versatility of encounter powers outweighs the simple static bonuses of the thief. Now, this [I]is[/I] with a very optimized character. The thief has the very key advantage of doing excellent damage without much need to invest in the ideal build. But that doesn't change the fact that other characters can present the same damage output - or higher - as the thief. The thief has the brief advantage at level 1, mainly due to having one key damage boosting feat (backstabber) plus some early and effective class features. But it certainly doesn't take until late heroic or paragon for others to catch up. Let's also check in with the scout, since you dismissed that as well. Level 4 Scout [sblock]Dex 20, Aspect of the Charging Ram/Lurking Spider, Spinning Axe Mastery, Axe Expertise, Double Axe Proficiency, Weapon Focus (Axe), +1 Double Axe. Let's assume he gets +1 to hit/+2 damage on the charge, and has CA for the follow-up attack. Assuming AC 19 for the enemy. Charge Attack: +12 vs AC 19: 1d10(B1)+11. On a hit, Dual Weapon Attack: +13 vs AC 19: 1d10(B1)+9. 1/20 chance of the first attack critting: 24.5 damage. 13/20 chance of the first attack hitting: 17 damage. 6/20 chance of the first attack missing: 0 damage. If the first attack hit (14/20 chance), 1/20 chance of second attack critting: 22.5 damage. If the first attack hit, 13/20 chance of second attack hitting: 15 damage. If the first attack hit, 6/20 chance of second attack missing: 0 damage. Average DPR: 19.8875 Twice per combat: Power Strike adds 5.5 damage. 5 round combat: 110.4375 damage.[/sblock] Scout comes out on par with the thief by level 4. He doesn't always get his second attack, but gets it often enough that the damage bonuses definitely add up. Your standard Rogue is also moving ahead of the thief by this point, due to encounter powers. The Slayer does come in behind the Thief, but has added durability. Same for the Barbarian - though multitarget powers and rages can push him higher. And for the Sorcerer, though his DPR is below the rogue if attacking one target, it only takes two targets to come out ahead, and that's not even acknowledging encounter and daily powers. Like I said, I think the Thief is definitely a top-tier striker, and probably the easiest one to come optimized right out of the box. And, at level 1, does come out ahead of most strikers - though many builds are certainly in the same league. Claiming he kills an extra monster per combat than all other strikers [I]just isn't accurate[/I]. And, just a few levels down the road, others begin to catch up. He remains competitive, especially at Paragon levels, but lacking daily powers and the versatility of chosen encounter powers... well, it definitely has an impact. You claimed he is always ahead of other strikers, and especially so at 1st level. The truth is that he is ahead of other strikers at 1st level, and is even with them - or behind them - at later levels. Either way, he is never so far ahead as to be in another league entirely - the class has its own strengths and weaknesses, and while undeniably effective and easy to play, it certainly doesn't outclass everyone else on the level you have been suggesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Thief seems overpowered to this new/old DM
Top