3) If I don't actually read the books and just play the game I can handle 4E. I like the game, I really do, but I can't read the books for whatever reason. Not enough fluff for me. I don't read crunch unless I have a character who needs that crunch at that moment. I just read for fluff when not preparing for a certain character / game.
Oh, I'm already a fan of both. It's just that I can't do things as I used to do them. I used to pour over the books looking for interesting tid-bits I could use but now all the powers and bare rules just overwhelm me. I never look at my books unless I'm at the gaming table. And the fluff books like FRCG are so limited in information I doubt I'm going to get any more of them. I'll play the game, but sadly I don't think I'll buy another D&D book, they don't have as much value to me as the other editions do. Plus I already own those.
Yeah and Wizards are emphatically not strikers... if you want to be a ranged blaster, choose Sorcerer.5. If you want to dish out pain in close combat pick a Ranger, Thief or Barbarian, not a Fighter.
While I agree with you guys on books like thr 4e PHB, I strongly encourage you to check out Open Grave and Manual of the Planes (and, from what I hear, Draconomicon). Having read the first two, I felt both delivered some of the best fluff of any edition.
While I agree with you guys on books like thr 4e PHB, I strongly encourage you to check out Open Grave and Manual of the Planes (and, from what I hear, Draconomicon). Having read the first two, I felt both delivered some of the best fluff of any edition.
2) My Dailies will never, ever hit so pick something with good miss results.
5. If you want to dish out pain in close combat pick a Ranger, Thief or Barbarian, not a Fighter.