Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Willow_Calypso" data-source="post: 2662010" data-attributes="member: 36821">I personally like the idea of pictures. As long as they're tasteful pictures. I think we're all adult enough to imagine what someone looks like nude. We don't need a picture of the bits to know folks got them. But if we do add pictures. I'd rather not see them in a display list (example: The Den). I originally liked the idea of the action/description bar on the bottom of the screen, but now; I don't like it so much. I have to admit the double login is extremely annoy, but I know you're already working on that. I'm not quite sure if I like the idea of adding basic physical attributes in a survery form on the profile page. That is why we have descriptions. Also I agree with the comment about Magi regulating the areas. I hate to say it, but it is currently needed. Folks have gone hog wild and forgotten that there is basic rules.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Willow_Calypso, post: 2662010, member: 36821"] I personally like the idea of pictures. As long as they're tasteful pictures. I think we're all adult enough to imagine what someone looks like nude. We don't need a picture of the bits to know folks got them. But if we do add pictures. I'd rather not see them in a display list (example: The Den). I originally liked the idea of the action/description bar on the bottom of the screen, but now; I don't like it so much. I have to admit the double login is extremely annoy, but I know you're already working on that. I'm not quite sure if I like the idea of adding basic physical attributes in a survery form on the profile page. That is why we have descriptions. Also I agree with the comment about Magi regulating the areas. I hate to say it, but it is currently needed. Folks have gone hog wild and forgotten that there is basic rules. [/QUOTE]

Verification