Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Things You Think Would Improve the Game That We WON'T See
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 9259719" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p>Heh, simplicity is an inherent self-evident "good".</p><p></p><p>Useless, redundant, and unnecessary complexity is "ugly".</p><p></p><p>"As simple as possible, but not simpler."</p><p></p><p>Think of how evolution works. Useless traits atrophy. Useful and versatile traits get reinforced.</p><p></p><p>Think of how science works. The simplest, most elegant, paradigm that can account for all known data, is the one that excels, and via Occams Razor, the one most likely to be true.</p><p></p><p>In game design, the most "elegant" design is the one that can detail the most amount of genre concepts with versatile and fewest versatile mechanics.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Every game would be super simple, except. There needs to be details. If one can fly, how does one fly? Wings? Telekinesis? If one can fly, what is the speed? Can one creature fly faster than an other creature? And so on. These details invoke the second half of the Razor, "but not simpler".</p><p></p><p>The conflict between "lumping" into a single mechanic and "splitting" into several mechanics, can be a matter of taste. But there is powerful need for simplicity, especially if a game is complex.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 9259719, member: 58172"] Heh, simplicity is an inherent self-evident "good". Useless, redundant, and unnecessary complexity is "ugly". "As simple as possible, but not simpler." Think of how evolution works. Useless traits atrophy. Useful and versatile traits get reinforced. Think of how science works. The simplest, most elegant, paradigm that can account for all known data, is the one that excels, and via Occams Razor, the one most likely to be true. In game design, the most "elegant" design is the one that can detail the most amount of genre concepts with versatile and fewest versatile mechanics. Every game would be super simple, except. There needs to be details. If one can fly, how does one fly? Wings? Telekinesis? If one can fly, what is the speed? Can one creature fly faster than an other creature? And so on. These details invoke the second half of the Razor, "but not simpler". The conflict between "lumping" into a single mechanic and "splitting" into several mechanics, can be a matter of taste. But there is powerful need for simplicity, especially if a game is complex. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Things You Think Would Improve the Game That We WON'T See
Top