This is a Review (Return of the Metathread)

[Dakkareth]

Misses the topic altogether but nonetheless launches into a discussion over the attitudes of 'some people'. Then defends the product reviewed on the basis that 'his philosophy is to disagree with a$$holes'. Later admits that he never heard of the actual product before and never intended to read it.

 

[Remathilis]

Misses the topic altogether but nonetheless launches into a discussion over the attitudes of 'some people'. Then defends the product reviewed on the basis that 'his philosophy is to disagree with a$$holes'. Later admits that he never heard of the actual product before and never intended to read it.

Reminds everyone this is just more rules glut that has negatively affected the gaming community. Chastizes anyone who uses said book. Reminds everyone rules-lite products are superior. Returns to stasis.

 

[Darrin Drader]

Pokes thread with a stick.

"Yep, there seems to be some life left in it."

Reinforce one of the more controversial points in the review by subtly mocking one of the posters who have criticised it. Follow it up with a number of smilies, just to be sure that the person I was referring to (and he knows who he is!) got the message loud and clear while clearing myself of any possible wrongdoing that would require the intervention of a moderator. Sign out, sign back in with an alt, insist that Michael Nesmith was the 5th Beatle. Log out of alt account, log back in, insult the post made by the alt because we all know Michael Nesmith is a talentless hack!

 

[DarrenGMiller]

makes new post to deceased thread a month after the last previous post after being directed there by a hyperlink from another thread

makes witty comment about thread necromancy, but adds nothing new to thread that it turns out should have stayed dead