This Weekend @ The Boxoffice: 2011_May.09

Hand of Evil

Hero
Epic
Over all I was pleased with Thor, it was a cookie cutter hero flick but it is important to remember, it had no major stars attached to it, other than Portman and not one of the comic book names.

Rating: 7/10

Weekend Report: 'Thor' Thwacks It Within the Park
by Brandon Gray --- May 8, 2011

Thor hammered out an estimated $66 million at 3,955 locations, handily dominating the weekend. The Marvel Comics adaptation's opening salvo wasn't as thunderous as Fast Five's $86.2 million nor recent summer starters like the Iron Man movies and X-Men Origins: Wolverine ($85.1 million), but it was bigger than Clash of the Titans (2010) ($61.2 million).

That $66 million meant Thor had the third highest first-weekend gross yet for the beginning of a Marvel movie franchise after Spider-Man and Iron Man. In terms of estimated attendance, though, Thor's opening weekend ranked below Hulk, X-Men and Fantastic Four but was still ahead of Daredevil and Ghost Rider. Other Marvel movies that fared better on the attendance front included The Incredible Hulk and Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer.

Thor's 3D presentations at a record 2,737 locations accounted for 60 percent of business. Distributor Paramount Pictures noted that Thor's start was well above the last 3D event, Tron: Legacy, which debuted to $44 million (though that's not quite apples-to-apples because it was a Christmas release). Also included were 214 IMAX 3D runs that contributed an estimated $6.6 million to Thor's gross. Paramount's exit polling indicated that Thor's audience skewed male (63 percent) and age 25 years and older (72 percent).

While Thor was ho-hum as far as summer kick-offs go these days, it was nonetheless solid for a lesser superhero movie, especially one that's all about contributing to a larger movie universe (The Avengers (2012)) as opposed to being a stand-alone property. Not every superhero is destined for box office greatness, and the less down-to-earth ones tend to struggle more than the earthly ones.

Meanwhile, Fast Five slammed on the brakes in its second weekend, grossing an estimated $32.5 million. It was down 62 percent, falling about as hard as Fast and Furious. However, Fast and Furious had an Easter advantage in its second weekend, skewing the comparison, and Fast Five lost most of its IMAX runs to Thor, dropping from 244 to 20 (which alone accounted for an estimated $510,000 of the weekend gross). On Saturday, Fast Five shot past Rango to become the top-grossing movie of the year so far, and it boasted a $139.9 million tally through Sunday, compared to Fast and Furious's $116.5 million through the same ten-day point.

The two wedding-tinged comedies, Jumping the Broom and Something Borrowed, debuted closely together in third and fourth, respectively, though Jumping was relatively more impressive, due to its far more modest production and marketing. Something made an estimated $13.2 million at 2,904 locations (worse than Ghosts of Girlfriends Past and Made of Honor among past early May romantic comedies), while Jumping swept up a nice estimated $13.7 million at 2,035 locations.

Something Borrowed was heavily pushed, but was held back by its bland premise of best friends after the same man, and it lacked a key ingredient to romantic comedy success, a strong male lead, focusing instead on the unsympathetic antics of Kate Hudson and Ginnifer Goodwin. Jumping the Broom's success shouldn't be overstated as it was within the average range of its genre, but it benefitted from a fun, clearly-laid-out marketing campaign that married the perennially popular and relatable themes of wedding, culture clash and meet-the-family. Something's audience was 73 percent female and 65 percent 25 years of age and older, according to distributor Warner Bros., while Jumping's audience was 70 percent female and 64 percent 35 years of age and older, according to distributor Sony Pictures. Next weekend, another wedding comedy, Bridesmaids, opens.

Rio rounded out the Top Five with an estimated $8.2 million, off 45 percent for a $114.9 million tally in 24 days. In milestone news, Insidious and Source Code each crossed the $50 million mark.

In limited release, The Beaver, starring Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster, flopped with an estimated $104,000 at 22 locations, though an expansion is still planned for May 20. The Roland Joffe-directed There Be Dragons was limp as well with an estimated $689,000 at 259 locations, but looked better in comparison. Two other movies with high-profile talent fared even worse: Last Night, featuring Keira Knightley, Sam Worthington and Eva Mendes, attracted an estimated $32,000 at ten locations, while Passion Play, with Mickey Rourke, Megan Fox and Bill Murray, stirred practically zero interest, opening to around $2,000 at two locations.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad



Okay, I guess it is time to start ranking the summer seasonal movies, just seems very early to be starting.

I seem to compare movies to last weeks movies, so let see how they stand up. Rating may change +/- as we move forward during the season.

Release Date ------- Title -------- Rating
2011.Apr.29 ------ Fast Five ------ 8/10
2011.May.06 ------ THOR --------- 7/10
 


Okay, I guess it is time to start ranking the summer seasonal movies, just seems very early to be starting.

Reminds me of Christmas time at the malls, here in Canada once Thanksgiving is done in October the Christmas stuff is out.... just keep stretching the "season" out a few months I guess...
 

Traditionally, Memorial Day is the start of the summer blockbuster season (in the US). So I'm in agreement with HoE that is seems to be starting a couple weeks early this year.
 

Okay, I guess it is time to start ranking the summer seasonal movies, just seems very early to be starting.

Well in that case:

Thor - 2 stars.

Fast Five - 3 stars.


My rating scheme: 1 star = not worth watching even under threat of death; 2 stars = only watch if you literally have nothing else better to do and you're not paying for it; 3 stars = ok, average, entertaining but nothing special, worth paying for as a rental; 4 stars = awesome, worth paying for at the cinema or making a night out of watching it; 5 = this is a must see movie that will possibly change your life or alter the physics of the universe.
 


Fast Five's middle part was relentlessly boring to me. They could have cut off 20 minutes, along with a few characters, and no one would have missed it.
 

Remove ads

Top