Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 9591510" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>I’m not having trouble understanding the rules as written, I am critiquing a problem with the rules as written, and using my homebrew (which if it isn’t obvious, has the exact same text as the invisibility spell and invisible condition, only the names have been changed) in order to illustrate what that critique is. People keep telling me I’m conflating the condition and the spell, or that my evaluation is based on preconceived notions because of the name of the condition, or that if the condition had a different name, there wouldn’t be a problem. So, I am using “homebrew” with the same text but different names to isolate the variable everyone seems to think is confusing me and show that the problem still exists in the absence of that variable. If you answer my questions, I’ll be able to demonstrate what my actual critique of the RAW is.</p></blockquote><p></p>