Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sorinth" data-source="post: 9592013" data-attributes="member: 7050650">I could be wrong here, but your responses come across as claiming that the DM making a ruling on facing is not RAW/RAI, which sure is their prerogative, but a strictly RAW reading is actually 360 degree vision.If that's the case I think you're wrong, the RAI & RAW is that it's DM discretion and very likely because any rules they try to write on facing will be flawed and exploitable so it's better to fully leave it up to the DM to judge.Oh and as a complete aside, there is an optional facing rule in the '14 DMG. Which heavily implies not that the intent is that facing exists but if your table doesn't like the default use case of it being DM discretion then here's a way of handling it.</blockquote>