Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Three Easy Pieces. What's in Your Box?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiddleback" data-source="post: 7651867" data-attributes="member: 6704070"><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Gaming pieces. Plastic, Wood, or Cardboard? Which one makes a game sing for you?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span>[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]<span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">I picked up Agricola this week. I know, I know, it came out ages ago and I'm behind the curve. Everyone who was interested in it has already got it. Except me, of course.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">So, why do I mention it? Because, inside the Agricola box is a small forest worth of wooden bits. If there is one thing I really like around here, it is wooden bits for games. The more the better. In fact, one of the chief distinctions between a Euro game of the Catan, Carcassonne, Power Grid variety and American games like Risk, Descent, and Ticket to Ride is the prevalence of wooden versus plastic playing pieces.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">To me, there is something very pleasing about a wooden game piece. Maybe the texture or the way they are colored or just the sort of rustic charm they add to a game is what does it for me. Plastic is all right and certainly has it's place when it comes to accurately representing what you are moving around the board, but it lacks a certain warmth and personal feel.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Risk, when it first came out, much like many other games at the time, used wooden pieces. I have an old Risk game from 1959 that use to belong to my Mother. Individual units are the, now typical, wooden block, but the pieces representing ten units together weren't easily defined shapes necessarily. They are strange, kind of oblong, pinched in the middle, wooden triangular shaped bits. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">And the colors! No one in their right mind today would produce pink army units in a 'serious' war game. Yet here they are, in their own individual slots, right next to the more traditional red, blue, black, and green. There is something fascinating about considering what was going through the minds of Parker Brothers when they produced the game. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">You lose that sort of thing in the shift to plastic pieces. Plastic bits are the thing they are supposed to be when you look at them. There are no secret mysteries to consider when you look at field guns or soldiers, they're field guns and soldiers.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Some games need the plastic pieces, though. They drive home the theme of the game. Games like Twilight Imperium and Space Hulk just wouldn't work as well if you weren't shuffling around all that plastic. The problem is, all that plastic tends to drive the price right through the roof what with having to design them, make molds and get them produced.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">No, for me, the wooden block is the way to go. Even those are getting more sophisticated though. Look at Carcassonne and realize that this is where the trend of amusingly shaped wooden pieces began. Those meeples, the little farmers/workers/what-have-you, began cropping up all over the place. And soon they were joined by much more diverse brethren.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Now you can find not just meeples, but witches, fedora wearing adventurers, clergymen, detectives, Dracula, Gandalf, lumberjacks, pirates, vikings, cavemen and much, much more. Those are just the human variants, the realm of animal shaped meeples is even more diverse. Polar bears, sheep, cows, dogs, kangaroos, penguins and a veritable zoo of other animals are all out there in meeple form.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">The real home of little wooden blocks seems to be war games though. Anyone who has experienced the Commands & Colors games from GMT Games can tell you that they come with a bevy of blocks. All of which need stickers applied to them, on both sides. Not something to be undertaken lightly.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">It is probably here though that my love of wooden blocks really developed. Applying all the stickers and then seeing them come to life on the board of this light war game really brought it all home for me. There was something almost majestic about the way the troops marched down the battlefield combined with the uncertainty of just which troops would be doing the marching. Equally magnificent was their retreat back up the field as my opponents Elephants routed them.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Lately the trend seems to be working away from both wooden and plastic bits. The recent economic downturn seems to have dictated a savings of resources in the games industry and brought about the advent of the cardboard chit as a reasonable substitute. Not that cardboard chits are necessarily new, as any fan of the former Avalon Hill can tell you.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">The current batch, however, are a step above those of earlier times. Thicker, more colorful, and with better detail, they can now be made to represent something other than a square mono-colored troop unit only identifiable by a number in the corner. Many current games are making full use of new printing and die cutting processes to bring their games to life in both a thematic and a practical way.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Properly good cardboard bits strike a happy balance between wood and plastic. They can capture the theme of a game in a concrete way while, with different finishes on the paper, they can provide an equally satisfactory tactile experience to wooden blocks.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Games like King of Tokyo and Small World, while two very different styles, make excellent use of their cardboard counters. In King of Tokyo's case, the giant monsters appear vibrant and colorful in ways that wouldn't be possible with wood while also appearing dynamic and full of action in a way that would be prohibitively expensive to do in plastic at that scale. </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Small World, on the other hand, takes the much more flexible die cutting methods available to cardboard and makes it almost a key implementation of one of the games core mechanics, the mixing and matching of various races and creatures with a selection of variable powers that help to make each game played different. Again, the vibrancy of the printing process makes the game pop and enhances it's visual appeal, too.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'">Still, wooden pieces really draw me in. Whether it is the little wooden houses, cities, and roads of Catan, the meeples of Carcassonne, the blocks of Commands and Colors, or the pieces of the cathedral in Pillars of the Earth, their tactile and visual appeal increase the enjoyment of a game for me. It is a pretty clear preference, too; the vast majority of my games make use of wooden bits in at least some capacity, by at least a factor of 3:1 over plastic based games. Agricola, being as wood heavy as it is, looks very promising indeed.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'verdana'"><strong>What about you though? What playing pieces do you prefer to use? Is plastic your preferred piece for it's ability to portray theme? Does cardboard make your games pop? Or is wood the touchy-feely champion at your game table? Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell me why you prefer one over the other.</strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiddleback, post: 7651867, member: 6704070"] [FONT=verdana]Gaming pieces. Plastic, Wood, or Cardboard? Which one makes a game sing for you? [/FONT][PRBREAK][/PRBREAK][FONT=verdana] I picked up Agricola this week. I know, I know, it came out ages ago and I'm behind the curve. Everyone who was interested in it has already got it. Except me, of course. So, why do I mention it? Because, inside the Agricola box is a small forest worth of wooden bits. If there is one thing I really like around here, it is wooden bits for games. The more the better. In fact, one of the chief distinctions between a Euro game of the Catan, Carcassonne, Power Grid variety and American games like Risk, Descent, and Ticket to Ride is the prevalence of wooden versus plastic playing pieces. To me, there is something very pleasing about a wooden game piece. Maybe the texture or the way they are colored or just the sort of rustic charm they add to a game is what does it for me. Plastic is all right and certainly has it's place when it comes to accurately representing what you are moving around the board, but it lacks a certain warmth and personal feel. Risk, when it first came out, much like many other games at the time, used wooden pieces. I have an old Risk game from 1959 that use to belong to my Mother. Individual units are the, now typical, wooden block, but the pieces representing ten units together weren't easily defined shapes necessarily. They are strange, kind of oblong, pinched in the middle, wooden triangular shaped bits. And the colors! No one in their right mind today would produce pink army units in a 'serious' war game. Yet here they are, in their own individual slots, right next to the more traditional red, blue, black, and green. There is something fascinating about considering what was going through the minds of Parker Brothers when they produced the game. You lose that sort of thing in the shift to plastic pieces. Plastic bits are the thing they are supposed to be when you look at them. There are no secret mysteries to consider when you look at field guns or soldiers, they're field guns and soldiers. Some games need the plastic pieces, though. They drive home the theme of the game. Games like Twilight Imperium and Space Hulk just wouldn't work as well if you weren't shuffling around all that plastic. The problem is, all that plastic tends to drive the price right through the roof what with having to design them, make molds and get them produced. No, for me, the wooden block is the way to go. Even those are getting more sophisticated though. Look at Carcassonne and realize that this is where the trend of amusingly shaped wooden pieces began. Those meeples, the little farmers/workers/what-have-you, began cropping up all over the place. And soon they were joined by much more diverse brethren. Now you can find not just meeples, but witches, fedora wearing adventurers, clergymen, detectives, Dracula, Gandalf, lumberjacks, pirates, vikings, cavemen and much, much more. Those are just the human variants, the realm of animal shaped meeples is even more diverse. Polar bears, sheep, cows, dogs, kangaroos, penguins and a veritable zoo of other animals are all out there in meeple form. The real home of little wooden blocks seems to be war games though. Anyone who has experienced the Commands & Colors games from GMT Games can tell you that they come with a bevy of blocks. All of which need stickers applied to them, on both sides. Not something to be undertaken lightly. It is probably here though that my love of wooden blocks really developed. Applying all the stickers and then seeing them come to life on the board of this light war game really brought it all home for me. There was something almost majestic about the way the troops marched down the battlefield combined with the uncertainty of just which troops would be doing the marching. Equally magnificent was their retreat back up the field as my opponents Elephants routed them. Lately the trend seems to be working away from both wooden and plastic bits. The recent economic downturn seems to have dictated a savings of resources in the games industry and brought about the advent of the cardboard chit as a reasonable substitute. Not that cardboard chits are necessarily new, as any fan of the former Avalon Hill can tell you. The current batch, however, are a step above those of earlier times. Thicker, more colorful, and with better detail, they can now be made to represent something other than a square mono-colored troop unit only identifiable by a number in the corner. Many current games are making full use of new printing and die cutting processes to bring their games to life in both a thematic and a practical way. Properly good cardboard bits strike a happy balance between wood and plastic. They can capture the theme of a game in a concrete way while, with different finishes on the paper, they can provide an equally satisfactory tactile experience to wooden blocks. Games like King of Tokyo and Small World, while two very different styles, make excellent use of their cardboard counters. In King of Tokyo's case, the giant monsters appear vibrant and colorful in ways that wouldn't be possible with wood while also appearing dynamic and full of action in a way that would be prohibitively expensive to do in plastic at that scale. Small World, on the other hand, takes the much more flexible die cutting methods available to cardboard and makes it almost a key implementation of one of the games core mechanics, the mixing and matching of various races and creatures with a selection of variable powers that help to make each game played different. Again, the vibrancy of the printing process makes the game pop and enhances it's visual appeal, too. Still, wooden pieces really draw me in. Whether it is the little wooden houses, cities, and roads of Catan, the meeples of Carcassonne, the blocks of Commands and Colors, or the pieces of the cathedral in Pillars of the Earth, their tactile and visual appeal increase the enjoyment of a game for me. It is a pretty clear preference, too; the vast majority of my games make use of wooden bits in at least some capacity, by at least a factor of 3:1 over plastic based games. Agricola, being as wood heavy as it is, looks very promising indeed. [B]What about you though? What playing pieces do you prefer to use? Is plastic your preferred piece for it's ability to portray theme? Does cardboard make your games pop? Or is wood the touchy-feely champion at your game table? Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell me why you prefer one over the other.[/B][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Three Easy Pieces. What's in Your Box?
Top