machineelf
Explorer
That is, a Quetzalcoatlus would have a carrying capacity of 15x15 (for Strength) x4 (for Huge) x5 (quadruped) = 5400 punds on the ground
Ooh ... that's a lot of Oreo's.
Thanks
That is, a Quetzalcoatlus would have a carrying capacity of 15x15 (for Strength) x4 (for Huge) x5 (quadruped) = 5400 punds on the ground
I worked out the dinos' carrying capacities before starting my own ToA campaign:
Ankylosaurus: 1,140 lbs
Deinonychus: 225 lbs
Hadrosaurus: 450 lbs
Triceratops: 1,320 lbs
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/carryingCapacity.htmQuadrupeds can carry heavier loads than characters can.
He didn't. If you check, you'll see the numbers are different.I think @pukunui has me on his block list - why would he otherwise repost what I just posted.
If the OP regards this as a major issue as you do, then I'm sure the figures you gave will be very useful.Note also that his numbers significantly nerf larger creatures (because 5E has done away with quadruped bonuses).
If a creature that should easily weigh (and eat) ten times as much can't even carry three times as much cargo, I know I would much rather have three smaller ones than a single Huge one.
The easy antidote to this is to use d20 rules, as I did.
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/carryingCapacity.htm
Now, the true answer? Find a way to get a Quetzalcoatlus and have a flying mount the height of a giraffe
I already know this and why.He didn't. If you check, you'll see the numbers are different.
Then . . . then why did you claim pkunui had reposted what you had posted? Annd why make the assertion that he had blocked you?I already know this and why.
That link isn't the same as the way that you suggested doing it though. You're suggesting the quadrupedal multiplier is size-based and used in addition to a size multiplier rather than a flat x1.5.If you had actually read my post you wouldn't write that. You would have realized I incorporated my clear suggestion to use the quadruped factor from d20.
I even gave a link.
The posts are saying two different things! They're not the same! One is not a repost of the other!Apart from not using that, our figures are identical since we use identical formulas.
Unlike him, you don't even have the excuse you didn't read my post.