THACO was a brilliant improvement over 1st Ed. As awful as it was, at least you had one number to remember, not twenty.kreynolds said:THAC0. Ugh. I hate THAC0.
Pielorinho said:THACO was a brilliant improvement over 1st Ed. As awful as it was, at least you had one number to remember, not twenty.
Pielorinho said:Get up from the computer right now and try running six feet in five seconds.
I actually liked 1e more than 2e. I don't really have a good reason for that, it didn't have smoother game play or anything like that. I suppose it was because it was 1e and it was supposed to be arcane and byzantine, so the wonkiness really added to the "Hey this is 1e!" experience whereas in 2e I just thought, "Man this game is wonky." I guess I was always disappointed in 2e because I wanted it to make sense and I never felt that disappointment in 1e because I never expected it to make any sense at all. I'm not even that wild about 3e, I'm just grateful its not 2e.Tequila Sunrise said:You have no idea. As bad as 3rd ed still is...I don't even want to know what 1st/OD&D was like.
YOu didn't tell me you were in an office! You should have told them (once they had finished their action of looking at you), "I'm thinking outside the box!" It should have taken you one minute to finish the phrase. Talk about promotion material!kreynolds said:My officemates just looked at me funny. Think I just damaged my career. You really should put disclaimers or warnings on suggestions like this.
Destil said:... Against psions the globes are even better.
Anguirus said:No, because it's still a 1st level power for all purposes. Psions have serious issues with globe of invulnerability.
Just because it sounds like Heighten doesn't mean it is.
Does your DM read this? That sounded like a challenge.Creeping Death said:I would hate to run into something with globe of invulnerability.