Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Treantmonk's Ranger DPS video:
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9499359" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Right, and while I understand you cannot actually mathematically account for every single variable, you need to explicitly state these kind of assumptions. Because making the claim "Dual-Wield pistols with vex always do the most damage" is very different than "Dual-Wield Pistols with vex do more damage if you assume always being within 30 ft, but never being in melee and if you do end up in melee you can switch to a different weapon to keep the advantage"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is sort of false. Yes, you end up with a string, but it is a string that can be broken on any single attack, or by needing to switch targets. Because Vex isn't "advantage on your next attack" it is "advantage on your next attack against the same enemy that you hit with your previous attack" Sure, you can assume you get close to 15 dpr on an infinite scale of attacks, but when you only get 5 attacks against the enemy, that can be a bad assumption.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It does not cost anything to move or use Hunter's Mark, in the situation that was described, which was a Dual Wielding Ranger using Nick. That was the situation. Stating "but you can do more damage theoritically by using this other loadout, therefore you are costing yourself THAT damage" is... kind of false. </p><p></p><p>And also, it should be noted what the practical difference is here. Let us assume for a moment 100% advantage on every attack from Vex, even the first one because the Ranger attacked from hiding or something. Here are the damages. </p><p></p><p>Dual Pistol - (8.5x0.84) + (5.5×0.0975) =7.676 x 2 = 15.35</p><p>Dual Shortsword (vex) - (6.5x0.84) + (3.5x0.0975) = 5.801 x 2 = 11.6</p><p>Dual Scimitar + Hunter's Mark (Nick) - (10x0.6) + (7x0.05) = 6.35 x 2 = 12.7</p><p></p><p>So, assuming Vex equals 100% perfect advantage (which it does not) the Shortswords do LESS damage than Scimitar + Hunter's Mark. The Pistols do still do more damage at this stage, but the difference is 2.65 DPR, which is not a lot. </p><p></p><p>And, let's say we move to level 8 or so, with maxed feats and attacks, what happens? (dropping shortswords and ignoring modifier increases for quicker math)</p><p></p><p>Triple Pistol - (8.5x0.84) + (5.5×0.0975) =7.676 x 3 = 23.03</p><p>Dual Scimitar + Hunter's Mark (Nick) - (10x0.6) + (7x0.05) = 6.35 x 3 = 19.05</p><p>NEXT ROUND being (10x0.6) + (7x0.05) = 6.35 x 4 = 25.4</p><p></p><p>So, interestingly, on the turn you set or move Hunter's Mark, the Triple Pistol with 100% vex advantage all the time (which won't happen) does more damage, but on a turn where you make 4 attacks against a target you have ALREADY marked, Hunter's Mark does more damage. </p><p></p><p>And THEN you can take a look at high level, when Hunter's Mark actually does give 100% advantage:</p><p>Triple Pistol - (8.5x0.84) + (5.5×0.0975) =7.676 x 3 = 23.03</p><p>Dual Scimitar + Hunter's Mark (Nick) - (10x0.84) + (7x0.0975) = 9.083 x 3 = 27.25</p><p>NEXT ROUND being (10x0.84) + (7x0.0975) = 9.083 x 4 = 36.33</p><p></p><p>And at this stage... Hunter's MArk is clearly doing more damage than your dual-pistols EVEN WHEN YOU MOVE IT. While I am granting you 100% perfect advantage on all attacks. </p><p></p><p>So again, this is a little more complex than you are making it sound. And even when you are correct, the difference is relatively small.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9499359, member: 6801228"] Right, and while I understand you cannot actually mathematically account for every single variable, you need to explicitly state these kind of assumptions. Because making the claim "Dual-Wield pistols with vex always do the most damage" is very different than "Dual-Wield Pistols with vex do more damage if you assume always being within 30 ft, but never being in melee and if you do end up in melee you can switch to a different weapon to keep the advantage" This is sort of false. Yes, you end up with a string, but it is a string that can be broken on any single attack, or by needing to switch targets. Because Vex isn't "advantage on your next attack" it is "advantage on your next attack against the same enemy that you hit with your previous attack" Sure, you can assume you get close to 15 dpr on an infinite scale of attacks, but when you only get 5 attacks against the enemy, that can be a bad assumption. It does not cost anything to move or use Hunter's Mark, in the situation that was described, which was a Dual Wielding Ranger using Nick. That was the situation. Stating "but you can do more damage theoritically by using this other loadout, therefore you are costing yourself THAT damage" is... kind of false. And also, it should be noted what the practical difference is here. Let us assume for a moment 100% advantage on every attack from Vex, even the first one because the Ranger attacked from hiding or something. Here are the damages. Dual Pistol - (8.5x0.84) + (5.5×0.0975) =7.676 x 2 = 15.35 Dual Shortsword (vex) - (6.5x0.84) + (3.5x0.0975) = 5.801 x 2 = 11.6 Dual Scimitar + Hunter's Mark (Nick) - (10x0.6) + (7x0.05) = 6.35 x 2 = 12.7 So, assuming Vex equals 100% perfect advantage (which it does not) the Shortswords do LESS damage than Scimitar + Hunter's Mark. The Pistols do still do more damage at this stage, but the difference is 2.65 DPR, which is not a lot. And, let's say we move to level 8 or so, with maxed feats and attacks, what happens? (dropping shortswords and ignoring modifier increases for quicker math) Triple Pistol - (8.5x0.84) + (5.5×0.0975) =7.676 x 3 = 23.03 Dual Scimitar + Hunter's Mark (Nick) - (10x0.6) + (7x0.05) = 6.35 x 3 = 19.05 NEXT ROUND being (10x0.6) + (7x0.05) = 6.35 x 4 = 25.4 So, interestingly, on the turn you set or move Hunter's Mark, the Triple Pistol with 100% vex advantage all the time (which won't happen) does more damage, but on a turn where you make 4 attacks against a target you have ALREADY marked, Hunter's Mark does more damage. And THEN you can take a look at high level, when Hunter's Mark actually does give 100% advantage: Triple Pistol - (8.5x0.84) + (5.5×0.0975) =7.676 x 3 = 23.03 Dual Scimitar + Hunter's Mark (Nick) - (10x0.84) + (7x0.0975) = 9.083 x 3 = 27.25 NEXT ROUND being (10x0.84) + (7x0.0975) = 9.083 x 4 = 36.33 And at this stage... Hunter's MArk is clearly doing more damage than your dual-pistols EVEN WHEN YOU MOVE IT. While I am granting you 100% perfect advantage on all attacks. So again, this is a little more complex than you are making it sound. And even when you are correct, the difference is relatively small. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Treantmonk's Ranger DPS video:
Top