Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Trip Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The_lone_gunman" data-source="post: 217744" data-attributes="member: 1143"><p>I listed the above quote because it was referenced from the PHB. I dont see how you guys can say that the statements above from the book don't infer that only certain weapons can be used to make trip attacks. I have listed the relevent statements below for easy reference:</p><p></p><p>Because the chain can wrap around an enemy's leg or other limbyou can make trip attacks</p><p></p><p>You can also use this weapon to make trip attacks.</p><p></p><p>Because of a Guisarme's curved blade, you can also make trip attacks. </p><p></p><p>Because of the hookon the back of the halberd you can use it to make trip attacks. </p><p></p><p>Becuase the whip can wrap around an enemey's leg or other limb, you can make trip attacks with it. </p><p></p><p></p><p>All of these statements explain what it is about the weapon that allows you to make trip attacks. Even the statements that you are "knocking down" your opponent with your weapon and foot, or other such nonsense put forth here, do not hold water if you look at these descriptions. Notice that they do not state something like "These weapons are superior for trip attacks" or "These weapons make GREAT trip attack weapons", they simply state that because of their design, they CAN be used to make trip attacks......so where is the argument? I know Hong will pull out his Thesarus and slide rule and come up with a logic argument, but for those of us here on earth, I don't see how this can infer anything else........</p><p></p><p>BTW I do love your arguments hong, that statement was meant as a compliment <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.</p><p></p><p>I personally find it silly to think that you could use a greatsword, sap, dagger, or many other weapons to trip someone.</p><p></p><p>Think of it like this. The "trip" manuever is a special manuver in D&D. Since D&D does not have "called shots", this is one of the special options you have to do something similar to a called shot. However, in order to do this, you need a special weapon, bludgeoning their legs out from under them with a mace is not something that I believe the designers intended.</p><p></p><p>Of course this is all my opinion, and I am sure others will oppose it and assure me that you could trip someone with short sword. I might even allow someone to try this crazy manuever in my game, but I would at least enforce an AOO and a -4 to hit with it (-4 for using the weapon "exotically" or as it was not intended to be used).</p><p></p><p>Thats my 2 cp. Feel free to disagree and try to convince me <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.</p><p></p><p>TLG</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The_lone_gunman, post: 217744, member: 1143"] I listed the above quote because it was referenced from the PHB. I dont see how you guys can say that the statements above from the book don't infer that only certain weapons can be used to make trip attacks. I have listed the relevent statements below for easy reference: Because the chain can wrap around an enemy's leg or other limbyou can make trip attacks You can also use this weapon to make trip attacks. Because of a Guisarme's curved blade, you can also make trip attacks. Because of the hookon the back of the halberd you can use it to make trip attacks. Becuase the whip can wrap around an enemey's leg or other limb, you can make trip attacks with it. All of these statements explain what it is about the weapon that allows you to make trip attacks. Even the statements that you are "knocking down" your opponent with your weapon and foot, or other such nonsense put forth here, do not hold water if you look at these descriptions. Notice that they do not state something like "These weapons are superior for trip attacks" or "These weapons make GREAT trip attack weapons", they simply state that because of their design, they CAN be used to make trip attacks......so where is the argument? I know Hong will pull out his Thesarus and slide rule and come up with a logic argument, but for those of us here on earth, I don't see how this can infer anything else........ BTW I do love your arguments hong, that statement was meant as a compliment :). I personally find it silly to think that you could use a greatsword, sap, dagger, or many other weapons to trip someone. Think of it like this. The "trip" manuever is a special manuver in D&D. Since D&D does not have "called shots", this is one of the special options you have to do something similar to a called shot. However, in order to do this, you need a special weapon, bludgeoning their legs out from under them with a mace is not something that I believe the designers intended. Of course this is all my opinion, and I am sure others will oppose it and assure me that you could trip someone with short sword. I might even allow someone to try this crazy manuever in my game, but I would at least enforce an AOO and a -4 to hit with it (-4 for using the weapon "exotically" or as it was not intended to be used). Thats my 2 cp. Feel free to disagree and try to convince me :). TLG [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Trip Attack
Top