Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="see" data-source="post: 8482798" data-attributes="member: 10531">When abandonment kicks in is a judgment call, but proof of nonuse for three consecutive years is considered prima facie evidence of abandonment under federal law.The second important fact is that TSR2 also registered and used the mark, and Hasbro/WotC apparently never disputed that use.The third is that when Hasbro/WotC resumed use, TSR2, despite having registered the mark, apparently never disputed the Hasbro/WotC use.So, anyway. If I understand trademark law correctly (IANAL, so my reading might well be skewed), there isn't any way TSR3 can win a declaration that they actually own the "TSR" mark, despite that being what they filed for the first time around. (Picking up a dropped registration just doesn't do that if someone else is using the mark in commerce; you can't seize exclusive control over an in-use-by-someone-else mark simply by registering it. And Hasbro/WotC was definitely using it for old product PDFs and POD in 2020.)But, it is possible that "TSR" the letters, as a mark for games, is no longer subject to trademark protection at all. The period of non-use, and the mutual non-enforcement between TSR2 and Hasbro/WotC, serve as evidence that it's no longer a trademark. In which case, anyone who wants to can freely slap the letters "TSR" on their games.</blockquote>