Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Turin Shroud Older Than Thought
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 1995428" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Having poked around a bit, I've found something even better, insofar is it is more fun to think about <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chemicals leave residues... unless you wash them out! </p><p></p><p>Try this one - while modern photography and "photonegatives" weren't known 700 years ago, some basic optics were known even to Aristotle. It is known that Leonardo da Vinci knew the theory and workings of the <em>camera obscura</em> - essentially a pinhole camera. Drawings of such are in his papers. So the man knew how to throw an image onto a surface.</p><p></p><p>Take a large cloth. Paint it all over with the appropriate mild oxidant solution - yes chemistry was lousy then, but you don't need it to be good, by today's standards, in order to work. Throw an image on the cloth using a <em>camera obscura</em>. The light energizes the oxidant, burning the image on the cloth. You then launder the cloth, washing out the oxidant, but leaving the image. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, I'm quite well acquainted with the "Too cool to be true" rule. It holds for the hard sciences as well. We don't have aliens and flying cars because they'd be just too cool <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why? Well, try this...</p><p></p><p>In Da Vinci's time, in Italy, having religious relics gave a family considerable clout. The Shroud was owned by the Savoy family. The Savoys had aspirations (and they achieved them, eventually becoming the royal family of Italy). The Savoys had a shroud since back in 1464 or so. But they didn't show it off much, and at least one local bishop declared it a fraud, and the Pope had to shut him up.</p><p></p><p>So, the Savoys are climbers, and want a nice shroud to exhibit. The Duke of Savoy had a son-in-law named Giuliano de Medici. Da Vinci worked for Guiliano, among others. Surely, the Savoys could afford to pay Da Vinci a considerable sum for the work. If that failed, Da Vinci was a vegetarian and practitioner of certain sexual practices the church frowned upon. If need be, Da Vinci could be pressured into making the thing. </p><p></p><p>Interestingly, in 1494, the Savoys switched from showing the shroud every decade or two to showing it every few years. Perhaps they were presented with a shroud that was better to look at?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 1995428, member: 177"] Having poked around a bit, I've found something even better, insofar is it is more fun to think about :) Chemicals leave residues... unless you wash them out! Try this one - while modern photography and "photonegatives" weren't known 700 years ago, some basic optics were known even to Aristotle. It is known that Leonardo da Vinci knew the theory and workings of the [i]camera obscura[/i] - essentially a pinhole camera. Drawings of such are in his papers. So the man knew how to throw an image onto a surface. Take a large cloth. Paint it all over with the appropriate mild oxidant solution - yes chemistry was lousy then, but you don't need it to be good, by today's standards, in order to work. Throw an image on the cloth using a [i]camera obscura[/i]. The light energizes the oxidant, burning the image on the cloth. You then launder the cloth, washing out the oxidant, but leaving the image. Oh, I'm quite well acquainted with the "Too cool to be true" rule. It holds for the hard sciences as well. We don't have aliens and flying cars because they'd be just too cool :) Why? Well, try this... In Da Vinci's time, in Italy, having religious relics gave a family considerable clout. The Shroud was owned by the Savoy family. The Savoys had aspirations (and they achieved them, eventually becoming the royal family of Italy). The Savoys had a shroud since back in 1464 or so. But they didn't show it off much, and at least one local bishop declared it a fraud, and the Pope had to shut him up. So, the Savoys are climbers, and want a nice shroud to exhibit. The Duke of Savoy had a son-in-law named Giuliano de Medici. Da Vinci worked for Guiliano, among others. Surely, the Savoys could afford to pay Da Vinci a considerable sum for the work. If that failed, Da Vinci was a vegetarian and practitioner of certain sexual practices the church frowned upon. If need be, Da Vinci could be pressured into making the thing. Interestingly, in 1494, the Savoys switched from showing the shroud every decade or two to showing it every few years. Perhaps they were presented with a shroud that was better to look at? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Turin Shroud Older Than Thought
Top