Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Blackbrrd" data-source="post: 6040290" data-attributes="member: 63962">So many questions! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Two-handed 1d10 damage weapons? Well, they would do less damage. Regarding the magic weapons - well, you will have to keep the to-hit bonus up to par with your main weapon or get a lower chance to hit.If you want to keep it "balanced" compared to THF you shouldn't be able to get extra dice from maneuvers like deadly strike and glancing blow. Mechanically you could then just as well have used THF, but for some characters it just makes more sense (style wise) to use two shortswords. For instance for Rogues. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Regarding your Longsword+Shortsword I don't think that was used very often, while Longsword/Rapier + Dagger/Main-Gauche probably happened a bit more. The damage difference you get by allowing it is minor and as noted above you do need two magical weapons to keep the to-hit bonus up to par.</blockquote>