Uncanny Feint with Invisible Blade

[mac1504]

Do I have it right that a 5th level Invisible Blade can make a feint action (uncanny feint- free action) on every one of his attacks if he takes a full attack action, thereby gaining (potentially, if he makes his Bluff checks) a sneak attack on each attack?

Thanks in advance.

 

[Sithobi1]

By RAW, yes, but IIRC, the maker of the class said that you should only be able to use it once per round, perhaps as a swift action. I may just be taking this out of the blue though, since I cannot remember where I read this.

 

[Caliban]

By RAW, yes, but IIRC, the maker of the class said that you should only be able to use it once per round, perhaps as a swift action. I may just be taking this out of the blue though, since I cannot remember where I read this.

Actually, the creator of the class said that you should only be able to do it once per ATTACK, not once per round.

By the RAW, you could make multiple feint actions between each attack, until you feel that you rolled high enough. Clearly not the designer's intent.

 

[mac1504]

Thanks Caliban- I wasn't even thinking of that situation, but following the RAW, you could do that I suppose. I won't be that evil with my group tomorrow

 

[the Jester]

Yes, a high-level invisible blade halfling is in fact a lawnmower from below. There's one in my epic game.

 

[Egres]

Actually, the creator of the class said that you should only be able to do it once per ATTACK, not once per round.

He changed the PrC.

Look at his web site: http://www.wakinglands.com/htm_files/the_main_page.htm

 

[Caliban]

He changed the PrC.

Look at his web site: http://www.wakinglands.com/htm_files/the_main_page.htm

Unfortunately, unless it's published as official errata, that won't change how it's played in most campaigns. Like when you play in the RPGA, for example.

 

[Egres]

Unfortunately, unless it's published as official errata, that won't change how it's played in most campaigns. Like when you play in the RPGA, for example.

Don't misinterpret my post, Caliban.

I was only showing that the author's intent is now changed.

You can play the PrC any way you like.

 

[Caliban]

Don't misinterpret my post, Caliban.

I was only showing that the author's intent is now changed.

You can play the PrC any way you like.

Sorry, wasn't trying to bash on you or anything. I just play a lot of RPGA, and they have strict rules about what sources you can use for character options, and only "official" WOTC errata is used.

 

[Coredump]

He changed the PrC.

Look at his web site: http://www.wakinglands.com/htm_files/the_main_page.htm

As I understand it. He didn't change the class. That was how it was originally written. WoTC changed it into two 5 lvl classes for CW. (Invis blade and Master thrower)

That also explains why the prereqs for invis make no sense in CW. Because the included stuff for the master thrower aspect of the original class.