Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Uncommon items - actually common?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9510993" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>I think it's fine to have prices vary due to local conditions, cut desirability, etc. It makes sense and if you want to get that complicated with gems, I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong. It's wrong for me, but it's not wrong for others unless they decide that it is.</p><p></p><p>That said, the problem you have with the above paragraph is that magic doesn't have likes and dislikes. Cut isn't going to mean squat to the spell. When you see 500gp of diamond dust, it's set default amount/quality that doesn't care about cut. Perhaps it's just X amount of gem grade diamond dust. By taking a larger(500gp in amount) gem grade uncut diamond and cutting it into smaller more valuable to humans diamonds, you are losing a portion of that 500gp amount and wont have enough to crush for the spell any longer, even if you can sell those diamonds to humans for 1500gp.</p><p></p><p>This is the same issue I pointed out with the Kardashian value several posts ago. The Kardashian value increases the total amount of that ruby for humans, but doesn't make the ruby itself more valuable. The cut increases the value of the diamond for humans, but wouldn't change the value for the purposes of the spell. </p><p></p><p>If things like cut desirability did change which diamonds would qualify for the spell, my character could take a small diamond chip that everyone else values at 1gp and because he loves diamond chips more than anything else(they are worth 500gp to him), he could crush it and cast the spell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9510993, member: 23751"] I think it's fine to have prices vary due to local conditions, cut desirability, etc. It makes sense and if you want to get that complicated with gems, I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong. It's wrong for me, but it's not wrong for others unless they decide that it is. That said, the problem you have with the above paragraph is that magic doesn't have likes and dislikes. Cut isn't going to mean squat to the spell. When you see 500gp of diamond dust, it's set default amount/quality that doesn't care about cut. Perhaps it's just X amount of gem grade diamond dust. By taking a larger(500gp in amount) gem grade uncut diamond and cutting it into smaller more valuable to humans diamonds, you are losing a portion of that 500gp amount and wont have enough to crush for the spell any longer, even if you can sell those diamonds to humans for 1500gp. This is the same issue I pointed out with the Kardashian value several posts ago. The Kardashian value increases the total amount of that ruby for humans, but doesn't make the ruby itself more valuable. The cut increases the value of the diamond for humans, but wouldn't change the value for the purposes of the spell. If things like cut desirability did change which diamonds would qualify for the spell, my character could take a small diamond chip that everyone else values at 1gp and because he loves diamond chips more than anything else(they are worth 500gp to him), he could crush it and cast the spell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Uncommon items - actually common?
Top