D&D 5E (2024) Unconfirmed Dark Sun World Book

[Zardnaar]

Yeah you won't get that from WotC these days.

They'll probably Spelljammer it up.

I'll probably do my own thing. OBS add some stuff that makes sense at least. Eg Genasi.

Got this made today.

 

[bedir than]

Yeah you won't get that from WotC these days.

As a reminder, several current settings have limitations.

 

[Uni-the-Unicorn!]

Yeah you won't get that from WotC these days.

Who knows, there are a lot of new people on / in charge of the D&D team

 

[Zardnaar]

Who knows, there are a lot of new people on / in charge of the D&D team

Im hoping fir not awful. I expect sone changes but hoping for more Eberron of FR treatment vs Spelljammer take.

Store here said something about February as well. Seems to early but idk.

 

[Stormonu]

As a reminder, several current settings have limitations.

Honest question - which ones?

 

[Parmandur]

Honest question - which ones?

Racnica and Theros.

 

[Remathilis]

Honest question - which ones?

Ravnica, Theros and Dragonlance all have a soft limit on species. As in, "these are the common species. Anything else is an outsider and subject to DM approval"

Additionally, several backgrounds and feats have a requirement of "X campaign" on them to take said feature. Usually these are world specific things like specific groups (Mage of High Sorcery, Purple Dragon Knight) or Dragonmarks. Forgotten Realms, Eberron, Dragonlance and Planescape all have options so marked, but it's a newer idea so not every setting was designed with this limit.

 

[bedir than]

Ravnica, Theros and Dragonlance all have a soft limit on species. As in, "these are the common species. Anything else is an outsider and subject to DM approval"

Additionally, several backgrounds and feats have a requirement of "X campaign" on them to take said feature. Usually these are world specific things like specific groups (Mage of High Sorcery, Purple Dragon Knight) or Dragonmarks. Forgotten Realms, Eberron, Dragonlance and Planescape all have options so marked, but it's a newer idea so not every setting was designed with this limit.

Yep!

Almost all of the "WotC would never do X" theories are things that WotC is currently doing and has done for years

 

[Remathilis]

Yep!

Almost all of the "WotC would never do X" theories are things that WotC is currently doing and has done for years

I mean, they are fairly soft limits. That species limit basically equates to "talk to your DM before picking tiefling" and the campaign limit is "your probably going to have to refluff this if you are using it outside it's home campaign." It's a far cry from the deep ban lists of 2e when whole classes were deleted from settings and half the PHB was removed or overwritten. But to me they are far more sensible limits for published settings being sold to a wide variety of people.