Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gradine" data-source="post: 7788107" data-attributes="member: 57112"> <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Wild Soul Barbarian is... for lack of a better word, wild. I like it, conceptually at least. "I accidentally blow up my own party" should be a comparatively rare occurrence, however, and not something approaching a 50% proposition. I'm not even sure I like 1-in-8, honestly.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Also, you couldn't bump that up to a d12, WotC? They're barbarians! d12s are their thing!</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Astral Soul Monk: So we've learned that locking a WotC designer in a room with a bag of peyote, a Playstation 3, and a copy of Asura's Wrath, and refusing to let them out until they come up with a class archetype, isn't actually that bad of an idea.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">If your opinion of Eberron includes believing it has robots then your opinion of Eberron is irrelevant. Sorry, I don't make the rules.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The idea that a piece of paper with a single line on it is inherently more likely to spur creativity than a complete blank page is neither novel nor really debatable, but it's possible to stretch that concept beyond applicability. There are pros and cons between buffet and package-style character creation options, and they all mostly boil down to player preference. I don't think one or the other could be said to universally allow more room for creative expression than the other (one might think the buffet style to be the obvious answer here, in fact, but again remember there is plenty of ability given towards creative expression when given the opportunity to play with the edges of an established archetype).</li> </ol></blockquote>

Verification