Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cap'n Kobold" data-source="post: 7713742" data-attributes="member: 6802951">I'm not sure whether you have understood the wording of that feat. A player can attempt to demoralise an enemy without the feat. This would usually take an action I believe, and might get the creature to back off, or a number of other effects.With the feat, it only requires an attack, allowing a character with multiple attacks to inflict the Frightened condition on more than one creature, or hit one and scare another etc. If you would normally allow a character to inflict the full Frightened conditioned on a creature in place of an attack, then the feat isn't going to be as useful in your game. A player might still want to take it because they want to play the intimidating badass and don't want to splash rogue or bard. At which point they can talk to you and you decide whether the rest of the feat is worthwhile, or tweak the last point so that it is useful in your game.</blockquote>