Unearthed Arcana Unearthed Arcana: Get Better At Skills With These Feats

The latest Unearthed Arcana from Jeremy Crawford and again featuring guest writer Robert J. Schwalb introduces a number of feats which make you better at skills. Each increases the skill's primary ability score, doubles your proficiency bonus, and gives you a little bonus ability. "This week we introduce new feats to playtest. Each of these feats makes you better at one of the game’s eighteen skills. We invite you to read them, give them a try in play, and let us know what you think in the survey we release in the next installment of Unearthed Arcana."

​

 

[Bad Fox]

I'm particularly curious what other people think about the doubling of proficiency bonuses. I've been kinda skeptical whenever I've seen this particular rule used, because I feel like if it gets too common, it'll just lead to DC inflation. Basically, more skill checks that will be almost impossible to succeed on unless you're rocking a double proficiency.

Up until now, I don't think it's felt too overused, but if these feats were put into the game...?

What do you think? Is this an unfounded concern?

 

[Gradine]

I expected to like this a lot better than I did. Half of these additional benefits are things that PCs should be able to do without the feat in the first place. Some of the bonus spells make a kind of sense, but giving alarm for Survival is the biggest reach I can think of.

 

[Sacrosanct]

I can see some abuse with the animal handler feat. Pretty much get extra attacks every turn as long as you have a pet.

 

[Gradine]

I'm particularly curious what other people think about the doubling of proficiency bonuses. I've been kinda skeptical whenever I've seen this particular rule used, because I feel like if it gets too common, it'll just lead to DC inflation. Basically, more skill checks that will be almost impossible to succeed on unless you're rocking a double proficiency.

Up until now, I don't think it's felt too overused, but if these feats were put into the game...?

What do you think? Is this an unfounded concern?

It's actually my favorite part of these feats. Remember that a feat is an incredible investment; one that I think you can argue isn't really worth it just for just an extra skill proficiency and a +1 ASI. The double proficiency allows your character to specialize in such a way to short-circuit Bounded Accuracy in a small number of corner cases; nothing really game-breaking (except for maybe in the case of Perception).

 

[TerraDave]

I think these are....great! Wish that some of the other UAs had been as good.

Some of the things here might be things that a character should be able to do without feats. But overall, these like really good ways to add flavor and (mostly) non-combat capabilities to characters that players might actually want to take.

 

[Capn Charlie]

I'm particularly curious what other people think about the doubling of proficiency bonuses. I've been kinda skeptical whenever I've seen this particular rule used, because I feel like if it gets too common, it'll just lead to DC inflation. Basically, more skill checks that will be almost impossible to succeed on unless you're rocking a double proficiency.

Up until now, I don't think it's felt too overused, but if these feats were put into the game...?

What do you think? Is this an unfounded concern?

At my table I use a system of scaling returns on skill checks. Say a DC is 13, if you get at least that, you have achieved the minimal tolerable level of success with no drawbacks. Fail it by less than 5 and you might still succeed but with drawbacks (hurting yourself on a jump) and fail it by 5 or more and you flat out fail with disastrous consequences. Succeed by 5 or more than the DC and you experience exceptional success above your expectations, and it goes up with every 5.

Say a DC is 18, and you manage a 28 on your check, you get two "upgrades" of success over the top, and great things happen for you.

As such, at my table, the upscaled results of double proficient skill checks are welcome, but not necessary.

 

[MonkeezOnFire]

I find these a bit underwhelming and uninteresting. Most of the bonus abilities are just things that skill checks already let you do but as a bonus action. I think the ones where you learn a couple spells are a little weird thematically since we already have mage initiate for that. Overall I couldn't see myself taking any of these over existing feats.

 

[posineg]

Wow, Stealth for the win. Hide behind that tree, jump out for the attack and then return to the tree... still hidden or will the attack still blow your cover?

 

[Ralif Redhammer]

I really like the various class-based expertise abilities. I’m fine with being able to spend a feat for expertise in a single skill. I don’t think it would create a proliferation of super-skilled PCs, though. Not when they’re already competing against the combat-oriented feats and basic ability score increases. I think the people that want expertise are just going to continue to gravitate towards the bard and rogue classes. Other than that, I think it would be the rare person that says “You know what, I want to be the best ever at History checks!”

I'm particularly curious what other people think about the doubling of proficiency bonuses. I've been kinda skeptical whenever I've seen this particular rule used, because I feel like if it gets too common, it'll just lead to DC inflation. Basically, more skill checks that will be almost impossible to succeed on unless you're rocking a double proficiency.

Up until now, I don't think it's felt too overused, but if these feats were put into the game...?

What do you think? Is this an unfounded concern?