Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gradine" data-source="post: 7713976" data-attributes="member: 57112">Simple."This was a clear and obvious oversight in the way this playtest feat was written. Of course the charm effect is broken and the king is capable of fighting back and protecting himself. Let me make a note of that for the UA feedback..."How you'd resolve it from there would depend on your personal DMing style and relationship to the player. Personally I'd give the player a chance to rewind their actions to the point before the tried to initiate their cockamamie scheme in the first place. Or, because we've already had this discussion, we can nip it in the bud:"Here's some playtest feats if you want to try them out. By the way, I know the Diplomat feat doesn't say it explicitly, but the charm effect is broken if you or your allies engage in hostile action against the person you've got charmed."Really, at this point if you allow such a situation to unfold you really have only yourself to blame. I mean, you should know better, this is Jon we're talking about! Jon! You know how Jon is. Why you wouldn't think to address in advance with Jon at the table is beyond me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>