Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana Introduces The Artifcer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Staffan" data-source="post: 7706645" data-attributes="member: 907"><p>Now <strong>this</strong> is an artificer I can get behind! (Because I wouldn't want to be in front of her when she's throwing alchemist's fire all over the place - hah!)</p><p></p><p>I like it. It's not quite what I would have done, but this has more of its own identity (mine was more of a reskinned Bard). On the first read-through, there are three things I'd add:</p><p></p><p>1. This is highly campaign-dependent (based on how much item creation the DM allows, so maybe there should be a sidebar about it), but the core identity of the 3e artificer was creating and use of magic items. They had the ability to use the skill Use Magic Device to bypass item creation requirements, primarily that of spellcasting. For example, if you wanted to make a pair of <em>boots of the winterlands</em>, you needed <em>cat's grace</em>, <em>endure elements</em>, and <em>pass without trace</em>. But the artificer had a very good chance of making them anyway. To reflect this ability in 5e, I would put in something like this:</p><p></p><p><strong>Arcane Polyglot:</strong> The artificer is a master of using and crafting a diverse array of magic items. An artificer ignores any requirements on attuning to a magic item. If the campaign allows for PCs crafting their own magic items, an artificer would be able to bypass any spell knowledge requirement on the item, as long as the artificer's level is at least twice as high as the spell level. <em>Example: In his campaign, Staffan has decided that in order to craft a </em>Staff of the Woodlands<em> you need to use the heartwood of the oldest tree in a major forest, with the permission of a treant native to the area. You would also need inlays from a certain number of rare trees, placed in a precise pattern portraying various animals. You also need to expend a few thousand gp worth of other components, and cast a number of spells including </em>wall of thorns<em> each day of the crafting. Nikolaj is playing an artificer in Staffan's campaign - he needs to buy/make all the stuff, and spend the time, but he does not need to cast any spells, and once the staff is finished he can attune to it even though he's not a druid.</em></p><p></p><p>2. I'm not too fond of the limited spells known for an artificer. Having full access to their whole, albeit rather limited in focus, spell list was one of the cool things about them in 3e.</p><p></p><p>3. There needs to be a clarification on how Concentration works regarding Infuse Item. I would have the item's user be the one concentrating on the spell (which would enhance the artificer's role as a buff specialist), but I could see it either way, and it needs to be clarified.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It might not give cantrips per se, but the Satchel and Thunder Cannon serve the same purpose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Staffan, post: 7706645, member: 907"] Now [B]this[/B] is an artificer I can get behind! (Because I wouldn't want to be in front of her when she's throwing alchemist's fire all over the place - hah!) I like it. It's not quite what I would have done, but this has more of its own identity (mine was more of a reskinned Bard). On the first read-through, there are three things I'd add: 1. This is highly campaign-dependent (based on how much item creation the DM allows, so maybe there should be a sidebar about it), but the core identity of the 3e artificer was creating and use of magic items. They had the ability to use the skill Use Magic Device to bypass item creation requirements, primarily that of spellcasting. For example, if you wanted to make a pair of [I]boots of the winterlands[/I], you needed [I]cat's grace[/I], [I]endure elements[/I], and [I]pass without trace[/I]. But the artificer had a very good chance of making them anyway. To reflect this ability in 5e, I would put in something like this: [B]Arcane Polyglot:[/B] The artificer is a master of using and crafting a diverse array of magic items. An artificer ignores any requirements on attuning to a magic item. If the campaign allows for PCs crafting their own magic items, an artificer would be able to bypass any spell knowledge requirement on the item, as long as the artificer's level is at least twice as high as the spell level. [I]Example: In his campaign, Staffan has decided that in order to craft a [/I]Staff of the Woodlands[I] you need to use the heartwood of the oldest tree in a major forest, with the permission of a treant native to the area. You would also need inlays from a certain number of rare trees, placed in a precise pattern portraying various animals. You also need to expend a few thousand gp worth of other components, and cast a number of spells including [/I]wall of thorns[I] each day of the crafting. Nikolaj is playing an artificer in Staffan's campaign - he needs to buy/make all the stuff, and spend the time, but he does not need to cast any spells, and once the staff is finished he can attune to it even though he's not a druid.[/I] 2. I'm not too fond of the limited spells known for an artificer. Having full access to their whole, albeit rather limited in focus, spell list was one of the cool things about them in 3e. 3. There needs to be a clarification on how Concentration works regarding Infuse Item. I would have the item's user be the one concentrating on the spell (which would enhance the artificer's role as a buff specialist), but I could see it either way, and it needs to be clarified. It might not give cantrips per se, but the Satchel and Thunder Cannon serve the same purpose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana Introduces The Artifcer
Top