Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7706662" data-attributes="member: 37579">It's fun to look at Unearthed Arcana and see the "test" mechanics. WotC puts some fringe stuff in there on purpose, poking us fans to see what actually elicits a response. When you know this, you can see the purposely odd design that's meant to stand out. Purposely proud nails. And there are a lot here with the artificer. The spellcasting of the artificer feels purposely low, rather than the safer 1/2 caster option. This is likely to draw extra attention to the spellcasting, and get people commenting on how much or little spellcasting people want from the artificer. So they can count how many people say "it's okay as 1/3 caster" versus the people who say "it should be a 1/2 caster". The class suffers from sorcerous subclasses syndrome: where you have one vanilla choice and one oddball choice, meaning most people really only have one build. This is to really draw attention to the fact there's a firearm subclass and see how people feel about that and get people commenting on the more vanilla potion brewing option. Ditto the mandatory pet. How do people feel about the artificer as a pet class? And free magic items. There's a lot of attention getters here. ThoughtsIt makes sense that the artificer is the craftsman and has tool expertise. That's fun. Why this is called "tool expertise" and not just "expertise" is unknown. It's odd that the artificer can make a magic item prior to being able to cast spells. Getting free magical items is cool. But there should be some way of replacing them if lost/ stolen/ destroyed. Or swapping them at higher levels. It's funky to effectively have a class feature that is vulnerable to theft.Infuse magic is pretty cool. It's not quite enchanting items, but it has a similar result: an item has magical powers. But this doesn't turn the DMG into a player resource, where you go through a giant list of magic items picking the most advantageous. Superior Attunement could be repharased so you can attune to an additional magic item rather than specifying four and five. Since the number of items is a campaign customization dial. This is a so-so feature, since the benefits of this are really dependant on having more than three magic items. AND at level five. I think two characters at my table have attunement items. For every other class 5th level is the power bump level (3rd level spells, Extra Attack), and the artificer gets a magic item ribbon power and a utility magical item."I can cast fireball!!" "Well, I can conjure a gallon of mayonnaise." Mechanical servant. Awesome at level 6, as CR 2 is tough. But it gets progressively weaker. And there's no "rebuild" option if you want to change robobutler's stats halfway through a campaign. And Large only. Seriously? At Large this isn't really a "servant" so much as a "steed". Why not a wolf or a monkey? Or a tiny homunculus.Dammit, I want a mechanical chicken or squirrel. Capstone. It's a capstone. Almost no one uses them. Even if you hit level 20, getting one requires no multiclassing. A capstone could allow you to kill one creature once per day (no save) and it wouldn't break many games. AlchemistAka the evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight. (Or Honey Lemon from Big Hero Six.) Definitely owes a debt to the Pathfinder alchemist. Only its bombs are limitless. It has unlimited alchemical fires in its satchel. That's a little funky. And the vial doesn't just become inert when it leaves your hand. It vanishes. Whaa? I like the concept but it hurts my verisimilitude. I'd prefer a set number that recharges after a Short or Long Rest. X number of potions, chosen when used. GunsmithYeah… not a fan of the existence or nonexistance of blackpowder and firearms existing being tied into a class. But that's really only an issue if there are just two subclasses. You can just ban this as a DM if you don't like. And the idea of artificers having firearms as specialty weapons fits. Or reflavour it into a magical rod.And dipping Gunsmith as a rogue will allow you to be an actual sniper. Not a fan that the rules for this class' guns are so completely different and dissociated from the rules in the DMG. What if you want to have pistols? But I imagine that'd be harder to balance with the other options. Right now my issue with the class is similar to my issue with the bard. Both are archetypal support classes, but lack a dedicated support subclass. The options provided are both ass kicking spotlight character options and less "I cast fighter on the monster" options.</blockquote>

Verification