Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana March 2016 Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChrisCarlson" data-source="post: 6845596" data-attributes="member: 6801216"><p>My point was that none of us can lay claim to having any kind of real stake/horse/dead in this debate/race/funeral. Except for the devs themselves and DMGuild submitters, perhaps. We are all spectators and recievers of free literature. How can we complain in good faith either way?</p><p></p><p></p><p>They provided a bunch of great content this month. I dare say I will likely get more use out of what I got from this month's article than any previous. In practical, table-seen use, I mean. And I say that as someone who has used previous article content in the past (and currently am even - like my College of Swords bard I am now playing in my friend's weekly OotA campaign).</p><p></p><p></p><p>How so? Do you feel the time the devs must have spent, pouring over the DMGuild for quality material, reviewing them, discussing them, and picking a few to showcase, was less useful to you than creating potentially similar content from whole-cloth just so they can put their own signatures at the bottom?</p><p></p><p>Also, ask the authors of the presented material if they feel the devs copped out. Ask prospective and current submitters, who now see a possibility of getting the same spotlight on their hard work, if <em>they</em> think its a cop out.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Lets be honest. Isn't that more or less your take on all of 5e? I admit to possibly getting that impression wrong, but the posts of yours I come across generally lead me to believe as such. Am I mistaken?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChrisCarlson, post: 6845596, member: 6801216"] My point was that none of us can lay claim to having any kind of real stake/horse/dead in this debate/race/funeral. Except for the devs themselves and DMGuild submitters, perhaps. We are all spectators and recievers of free literature. How can we complain in good faith either way? They provided a bunch of great content this month. I dare say I will likely get more use out of what I got from this month's article than any previous. In practical, table-seen use, I mean. And I say that as someone who has used previous article content in the past (and currently am even - like my College of Swords bard I am now playing in my friend's weekly OotA campaign). How so? Do you feel the time the devs must have spent, pouring over the DMGuild for quality material, reviewing them, discussing them, and picking a few to showcase, was less useful to you than creating potentially similar content from whole-cloth just so they can put their own signatures at the bottom? Also, ask the authors of the presented material if they feel the devs copped out. Ask prospective and current submitters, who now see a possibility of getting the same spotlight on their hard work, if [i]they[/i] think its a cop out. Lets be honest. Isn't that more or less your take on all of 5e? I admit to possibly getting that impression wrong, but the posts of yours I come across generally lead me to believe as such. Am I mistaken? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana March 2016 Review
Top