Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Travelers of the Multiverse
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JEB" data-source="post: 8421177" data-attributes="member: 10148"><p>I'm not an optimizer, at all, but I can see someone declaring their character to be both capital-S Small size for any perceived game advantages, yet tall enough to argue with their DM that they can override any story-based disadvantages of being lowercase-s small. Having height/weight ranges for at least generic "Small" and "Medium" characters would be a nice minimum to avoid such silly but frustrating potential issues.</p><p></p><p>If they don't plan to concern themselves with differentiating Small and Medium PCs in any lore sense, then they might as well just eliminate Small-sized PCs and be done with it. If we can have Medium characters that are basically Large characters, why not also have Medium characters that are basically Small characters? Give them a "Diminutive Build" trait or something. (This wouldn't be my preference, to be clear, but it would avoid the issue.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd hope they do the latter (generalities with an emphasis on your character being whatever they want). Even better if they describe multiple possible cultures, which players could implicitly mix and match when building their own character background; that should be easy for Wizards to do, since they already have multiple cultures for most races.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I just noticed this:</p><p></p><p>So you may be right, humans will be treated completely separately from non-human races, and quite possibly will have their own rules for ASIs instead of the standard +2/+1 or +1(x3). I suppose that's one solution. That would also give them leeway to keep Variant Human largely the same as before, so long as they define it as cultural influence (which I imagine most folks assumed anyway).</p><p></p><p></p><p>The DMG is where the racial features for NPCs are located, at least as of 2014 5E. I suppose that could be one place to put ASIs in 2024 5E. However, many players will never read a book outside the PHB, so the convenient location for that information - that is, the place it would be useful for quick-build purposes other than "optimize for your class!" - is still the PHB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JEB, post: 8421177, member: 10148"] I'm not an optimizer, at all, but I can see someone declaring their character to be both capital-S Small size for any perceived game advantages, yet tall enough to argue with their DM that they can override any story-based disadvantages of being lowercase-s small. Having height/weight ranges for at least generic "Small" and "Medium" characters would be a nice minimum to avoid such silly but frustrating potential issues. If they don't plan to concern themselves with differentiating Small and Medium PCs in any lore sense, then they might as well just eliminate Small-sized PCs and be done with it. If we can have Medium characters that are basically Large characters, why not also have Medium characters that are basically Small characters? Give them a "Diminutive Build" trait or something. (This wouldn't be my preference, to be clear, but it would avoid the issue.) I'd hope they do the latter (generalities with an emphasis on your character being whatever they want). Even better if they describe multiple possible cultures, which players could implicitly mix and match when building their own character background; that should be easy for Wizards to do, since they already have multiple cultures for most races. I just noticed this: So you may be right, humans will be treated completely separately from non-human races, and quite possibly will have their own rules for ASIs instead of the standard +2/+1 or +1(x3). I suppose that's one solution. That would also give them leeway to keep Variant Human largely the same as before, so long as they define it as cultural influence (which I imagine most folks assumed anyway). The DMG is where the racial features for NPCs are located, at least as of 2014 5E. I suppose that could be one place to put ASIs in 2024 5E. However, many players will never read a book outside the PHB, so the convenient location for that information - that is, the place it would be useful for quick-build purposes other than "optimize for your class!" - is still the PHB. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Travelers of the Multiverse
Top