NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8426494" data-attributes="member: 6801228">The one where you went bold and screamy against the idea of taking a portal from one setting to sigil then another portal from sigil to another setting. You are probably, with this question, trying to indicate that OF COURSE, you can do that, but you won't be specifically where you want to be in that setting. But, ya know what's funny? Traveling through the sky of a setting is multiple times safer than traveling between spheres (far fewer monsters) and since Spelljamming technology is so easily avaiable, they can hop in their flying ship to go from Sarlona to Khorvaire. Which STILL doesn't have them using the Spelljammer to travel between spheres.And none of this making up problems really makes it any easier to fly between realities, where you must contend with far far more dangerous situations. I would also say that "thousands" is not "countless". Thousands indicates that they have counted. Sigil has Modrons, they are immortal, tireless and can count in the trillions if that is their purpose. So, I'm going to have to say that "countless" when dealing with immortals means "basically infinite". Maybe not actually infinite, maybe there are dead realities that no one can find a portal to... but if there are no portals to them, then is anyone even looking to go there? How would they know about that reality to try and go there in a ship? Which direction do they fly for how long? I mean, let's be fair and balanced here. If a crystal sphere is 2,000 years away by Spelljammer ship, no one is going there anyways. Even if they know about it, there is no point.The portal doesn't open into a sun. That's how.See, words like "Many" or "Most" indicate not all. So, why do I think that some portals are permenant when we are told that some portals aren't permanent? Because in a binary state like that, both things end up being true.</blockquote>

Verification