Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardcoreDandDGirl" data-source="post: 7651205" data-attributes="member: 82746">I just posted a responce on the WotC board I am reposting here:[quote author=89242858 post=532682003]One thing missing from new editions is making females weaker than males. I know its fantasy but it was a lot less dissonant for me when females were a little weaker. You can look at this as flabbier or just less developed, whatever fits your milieu. If it is easy to houserule out that's fine, but if it is too embroiled in the mechanics for women to be as strong as men it is a dealbreaker for me. Its too dissonant.</blockquote>I am a 26 year old woman, and for the last ten years I have never in my experance met a man who could kick my butt. I don't know if you would call it Str, Dex, or Con, or all three (the system is a little abstact) but my ability to inflick damage is in no way effected by being able to have children, or having boobs...I also know plenty of people who work out, and many woman can keep up with men at weight lifting. You sir are offencive. I see no reason why my fighter needs to take a penelty to hit and damage just becuse you seem to think that is 'more realistic'. Maybe at my next kick boxing class I will tell my best friend (linda) and our teacher (Maggy) they are not as good at dealing damage as men...see how they take it.[/QUOTE]