Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dropbear8mybaby" data-source="post: 7710668" data-attributes="member: 6863518">Err, yes it is, and yes it always has been. What a silly thing to say. That big companies can fail at things doesn't determine their likelihood of success in comparison to a smaller company. These things are not equal. A bigger company with more resources is far more likely and able to complete a project than a smaller company. I don't even see how that can even be argued against. Trapdoor didn't have the resources, planning, experience or expertise to complete the project. That was self-evident throughout the entire process and through the information that came to light after it was abandoned.There is no guarantee that Curse can make a good product or that it will be successful and profitable for them. But to say that it isn't much more likely that they can do it, in comparison to Trapdoor, is a little absurd.I wasn't making anything up. Most of what I said was reported on this very site.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dropbear8mybaby, post: 7710668, member: 6863518"] Err, yes it is, and yes it always has been. What a silly thing to say. That big companies can fail at things doesn't determine their likelihood of success in comparison to a smaller company. These things are not equal. A bigger company with more resources is [I]far[/I] more likely and able to complete a project than a smaller company. I don't even see how that can even be argued against. Trapdoor didn't have the resources, planning, experience or expertise to complete the project. That was self-evident throughout the entire process and through the information that came to light after it was abandoned. There is no guarantee that Curse can make a good product or that it will be successful and profitable for them. But to say that it isn't [I]much[/I] more likely that they can do it, in comparison to Trapdoor, is a little absurd. I wasn't making anything up. Most of what I said was reported on this very site. [/QUOTE]

Verification